UITB vs. AGZD
UITB (VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF) and AGZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - UITB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Victory Capital, while AGZD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. UITB is actively managed, while AGZD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UITB returned 0.56%/yr vs 4.32%/yr for AGZD. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. UITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for AGZD.
Performance
UITB vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UITB achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than AGZD's 2.22% return.
UITB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.56%
- 10Y*
- —
AGZD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.32%
- 10Y*
- 3.15%
UITB vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | 0.17% | 7.32% | 1.81% | 6.49% | -12.23% | -0.88% | 7.99% | 11.40% | -1.31% | 0.99% |
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 2.22% | 4.35% | 6.64% | 7.15% | 1.17% | 0.69% | 0.31% | 4.65% | 0.18% | 0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between UITB and AGZD is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | -0.10 |
The correlation between UITB and AGZD shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (5 years) to 0.04 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UITB vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank
UITB
AGZD
UITB vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UITB | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 6.09 | -4.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 19.08 | -13.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UITB | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.83 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 1.21 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.64 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
UITB vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UITB drawdown since its inception was -17.02%, which is greater than AGZD's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UITB and AGZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UITB | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.02% | -8.46% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -0.87% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.44% | -1.71% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.02% | -2.23% | -14.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -0.39% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -0.77% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 0.28% | +0.63% |
Volatility
UITB vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) at 1.03%. This indicates that UITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UITB | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 1.03% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | 1.99% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 2.89% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.64% | 3.59% | +2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 3.72% | +1.26% |
UITB vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
UITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
UITB vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison
UITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than AGZD's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.99% | 4.12% | 3.96% | 6.07% | 8.61% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.66% |
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | 4.17% | 4.04% | 3.89% | 3.14% | 2.32% | 1.95% | 2.79% | 3.01% | 2.99% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UITB and AGZD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UITB has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to AGZD (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UITB dropped -17.02% vs AGZD's -8.46%.
On 5-year performance, AGZD leads with 4.32% vs 0.56% for UITB. On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, AGZD has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AGZD has performed better with a 4.32% return vs 0.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for UITB.
UITB has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 3.99% for AGZD.
UITB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while AGZD is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for UITB and 0.23% for AGZD.
AGZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UITB and AGZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer