UIMR.DE vs. AMED.DE
UIMR.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - UIMR.DE tracks the MSCI EMU SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UIMR.DE returned 9.02%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UIMR.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
UIMR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIMR.DE achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, UIMR.DE has underperformed AMED.DE with an annualized return of 9.02%, while AMED.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.
UIMR.DE
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 7.06%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 9.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
UIMR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIMR.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 7.06% | 14.40% | 12.70% | 12.99% | -15.85% | 21.22% | -0.84% | 31.79% | -8.67% | 14.91% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIMR.DE and AMED.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2011 | 0.94 |
The correlation between UIMR.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIMR.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIMR.DE
AMED.DE
UIMR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIMR.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.33 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 2.49 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.08 | 9.40 | -6.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIMR.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.74 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.65 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.57 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.47 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
UIMR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIMR.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.55%, roughly equal to the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMR.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIMR.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.55% | -38.35% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -10.56% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.69% | -14.07% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.63% | -24.06% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.55% | -38.35% | +0.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.17% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -6.69% | +1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.81% | +0.48% |
Volatility
UIMR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) is 4.46%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that UIMR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIMR.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 5.61% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 12.64% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 15.19% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 15.87% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 17.00% | -0.06% |
UIMR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIMR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UIMR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
UIMR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIMR.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 1.57% | 1.86% | 1.91% | 2.26% | 2.80% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 2.61% | 3.34% | 2.69% | 3.34% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, UIMR.DE and AMED.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UIMR.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIMR.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
UIMR.DE tracks MSCI EMU SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UIMR.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIMR.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer