UIMI.DE vs. QDVS.DE
UIMI.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and QDVS.DE (iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - UIMI.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets while QDVS.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIMI.DE returned 8.50%/yr vs 5.01%/yr for QDVS.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UIMI.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QDVS.DE.
Performance
UIMI.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIMI.DE achieves a 27.62% return, which is significantly higher than QDVS.DE's 17.24% return.
UIMI.DE
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 27.62%
- 6M
- 28.59%
- 1Y
- 49.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
QDVS.DE
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 17.96%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- —
UIMI.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIMI.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 27.62% | 20.10% | 13.22% | 5.76% | -14.07% | 4.14% | 6.29% | 22.09% | -11.16% | 20.67% |
QDVS.DE iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF | 17.24% | 16.78% | 11.26% | -2.12% | -12.39% | 6.97% | 6.67% | 19.37% | -6.54% | 18.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIMI.DE and QDVS.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2016 | 0.94 |
The correlation between UIMI.DE and QDVS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIMI.DE vs. QDVS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIMI.DE
QDVS.DE
UIMI.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMI.DE) and iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIMI.DE | QDVS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.38 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 3.50 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.64 | 12.67 | +4.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIMI.DE | QDVS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 2.11 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.29 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.40 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
UIMI.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIMI.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVS.DE drawdown of -36.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMI.DE and QDVS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIMI.DE | QDVS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -36.51% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.26% | -10.19% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.74% | -20.83% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.93% | -25.09% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -3.00% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -8.82% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.82% | +0.01% |
Volatility
UIMI.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMI.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) at 6.00%. This indicates that UIMI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIMI.DE | QDVS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 6.00% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 13.84% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 16.93% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 16.89% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 18.68% | -0.41% |
UIMI.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIMI.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UIMI.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Dividend Comparison
UIMI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while QDVS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVS.DE iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIMI.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.69% | 2.31% | 2.10% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 1.68% | 1.82% | 2.17% | 2.03% | 1.67% | 2.54% | 2.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, UIMI.DE and QDVS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UIMI.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIMI.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QDVS.DE.
UIMI.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while QDVS.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UIMI.DE and 0.25% for QDVS.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIMI.DE and QDVS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer