PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIMI.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIMI.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMI.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIMI.DE achieves a 27.62% return, which is significantly higher than 4UBQ.DE's 11.15% return.


UIMI.DE

1D
-1.51%
1M
5.91%
YTD
27.62%
6M
29.93%
1Y
50.04%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
9.97%

4UBQ.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
5.42%
YTD
11.15%
6M
11.64%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
15.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIMI.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UIMI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
27.62%20.10%13.22%5.76%-14.07%4.14%11.80%
4UBQ.DE
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.15%5.39%31.02%24.03%-13.92%43.62%8.66%

Correlation

The correlation between UIMI.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020

0.55

The correlation between UIMI.DE and 4UBQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIMI.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIMI.DE
UIMI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
UIMI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIMI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIMI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
UIMI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIMI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

4UBQ.DE
4UBQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIMI.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMI.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIMI.DE4UBQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

4.10

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.64

15.73

+1.91

UIMI.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIMI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the 4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIMI.DE and 4UBQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIMI.DE4UBQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

2.47

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

1.00

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.11

-0.78

Drawdowns

UIMI.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIMI.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than 4UBQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMI.DE and 4UBQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIMI.DE4UBQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-23.35%

-12.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.26%

-6.93%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.74%

-23.35%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.93%

-23.35%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

0.00%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-4.02%

-7.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

1.81%

+1.02%

Volatility

UIMI.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMI.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) at 2.81%. This indicates that UIMI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4UBQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIMI.DE4UBQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

2.81%

+4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.92%

7.61%

+7.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.74%

11.53%

+6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

15.27%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

15.39%

+2.88%

UIMI.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIMI.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UIMI.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

UIMI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while 4UBQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
4UBQ.DE
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UIMI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.69%2.31%2.10%2.63%2.91%1.68%1.82%2.17%2.03%1.67%2.54%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


UIMI.DE and 4UBQ.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4UBQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4UBQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UIMI.DE.

UIMI.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while 4UBQ.DE is S&P 500. UIMI.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UIMI.DE and 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIMI.DE and 4UBQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer