QDVS.DE vs. CEBL.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) and iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE).
QDVS.DE and CEBL.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDVS.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. It was launched on Jul 11, 2016. CEBL.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. It was launched on Aug 6, 2010. Both QDVS.DE and CEBL.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QDVS.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QDVS.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVS.DE iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF | 2.92% | 16.78% | 11.26% | -2.12% | -12.39% | 6.97% | 6.67% | 19.37% | -6.54% | 18.05% |
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 3.70% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVS.DE achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than CEBL.DE's 3.70% return.
QDVS.DE
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 7.01%
- 1Y
- 24.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 23.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDVS.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CEBL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
QDVS.DE vs. CEBL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVS.DE
CEBL.DE
QDVS.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) and iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVS.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 1.17 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 1.65 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 2.49 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.71 | 9.33 | +1.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVS.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.17 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.19 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.35 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVS.DE and CEBL.DE is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QDVS.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVS.DE nor CEBL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
QDVS.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVS.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.51%, roughly equal to the maximum CEBL.DE drawdown of -35.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVS.DE and CEBL.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVS.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.51% | -35.09% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -11.43% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | -29.00% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.36% | -9.76% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | -11.19% | +2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 3.05% | -0.33% |
Volatility
QDVS.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) is 7.00%, while iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that QDVS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEBL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QDVS.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.00% | 7.68% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 14.46% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.28% | 20.34% | -2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 17.92% | -1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 18.70% | -0.09% |