PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIMI.DE vs. FVEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIMI.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMI.DE) and Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIMI.DE achieves a 29.16% return, which is significantly higher than FVEM.DE's 25.46% return.


UIMI.DE

1D
0.50%
1M
2.41%
YTD
29.16%
6M
31.10%
1Y
48.56%
3Y*
21.85%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
10.38%

FVEM.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.95%
YTD
25.46%
6M
26.71%
1Y
44.73%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIMI.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UIMI.DE and FVEM.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2023

0.93

The correlation between UIMI.DE and FVEM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIMI.DE vs. FVEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIMI.DE
UIMI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
UIMI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIMI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIMI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
UIMI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIMI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FVEM.DE
FVEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FVEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIMI.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMI.DE) and Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UIMI.DEFVEM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.43

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

4.23

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.14

15.44

+0.70

UIMI.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIMI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the FVEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIMI.DE and FVEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UIMI.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIMI.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, which is greater than FVEM.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMI.DE and FVEM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIMI.DEFVEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.57%

-18.76%

-28.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.25%

-10.62%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.74%

-18.76%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-4.53%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.15%

-4.39%

-13.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.91%

+0.09%

Volatility

UIMI.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMI.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.78% compared to Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) at 8.36%. This indicates that UIMI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIMI.DEFVEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.78%

8.36%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.70%

16.46%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.16%

19.01%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

16.82%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

16.82%

+1.55%

UIMI.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UIMI.DE and FVEM.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UIMI.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

UIMI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while FVEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVEM.DE
Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UIMI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.67%2.30%2.10%2.63%2.91%1.68%1.82%2.17%2.03%1.67%2.54%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, UIMI.DE and FVEM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UIMI.DE and FVEM.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

UIMI.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while FVEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Paris Aligned. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Franklin Templeton.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIMI.DE and FVEM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer