UIME.DE vs. AMED.DE
UIME.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - UIME.DE tracks the MSCI EMU Value while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UIME.DE returned 9.94%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
UIME.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIME.DE achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UIME.DE having a 9.94% annualized return and AMED.DE not far behind at 9.75%.
UIME.DE
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 7.26%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 21.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.26%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
UIME.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIME.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 7.26% | 37.25% | 9.43% | 18.66% | -4.81% | 19.85% | -7.50% | 19.70% | -14.45% | 10.61% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIME.DE and AMED.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.91 |
The correlation between UIME.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIME.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIME.DE
AMED.DE
UIME.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIME.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIME.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.49 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.21 | 9.40 | -1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIME.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.74 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.65 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.57 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.47 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
UIME.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIME.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.99%, which is greater than AMED.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIME.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIME.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.99% | -38.35% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -10.56% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.54% | -14.07% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.67% | -24.06% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.99% | -38.35% | -3.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -0.17% | -1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -6.69% | -2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.81% | -0.18% |
Volatility
UIME.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIME.DE) is 3.60%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that UIME.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIME.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 5.61% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 12.64% | -2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 15.19% | -2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 15.87% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 17.00% | +0.85% |
UIME.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UIME.DE and AMED.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UIME.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
UIME.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIME.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 3.75% | 3.42% | 3.51% | 3.89% | 4.13% | 2.67% | 2.40% | 3.87% | 4.07% | 3.49% | 5.50% | 4.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIME.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIME.DE and AMED.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
UIME.DE tracks MSCI EMU Value, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi.
Find the right allocation for UIME.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer