PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIM7.DE vs. CBUG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIM7.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIM7.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIM7.DE achieves a 11.61% return, which is significantly lower than CBUG.DE's 15.46% return.


UIM7.DE

1D
-1.07%
1M
0.59%
6M
8.72%
YTD
11.61%
1Y
21.56%
3Y*
17.29%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
12.17%

CBUG.DE

1D
-1.14%
1M
-0.82%
6M
9.01%
YTD
15.46%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIM7.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UIM7.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
11.61%7.63%25.66%19.90%-13.93%2.33%
CBUG.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist)
15.46%6.50%13.10%11.25%-14.07%2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between UIM7.DE and CBUG.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021

0.85

The correlation between UIM7.DE and CBUG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIM7.DE vs. CBUG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIM7.DE
UIM7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
UIM7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIM7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIM7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UIM7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIM7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUG.DE
CBUG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIM7.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIM7.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UIM7.DECBUG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.54

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.31

13.20

+0.11

UIM7.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIM7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIM7.DE and CBUG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UIM7.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIM7.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.36%, which is greater than CBUG.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIM7.DE and CBUG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIM7.DECBUG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.36%

-24.57%

-36.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-7.24%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.66%

-24.57%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-3.20%

+2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.65%

-7.33%

-6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.95%

-0.33%

Volatility

UIM7.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIM7.DE) is 2.65%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that UIM7.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIM7.DECBUG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

3.96%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

10.22%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

14.13%

-2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

16.64%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.05%

16.64%

-1.59%

UIM7.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIM7.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUG.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIM7.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Dividend Comparison

UIM7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while CBUG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBUG.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UIM7.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.89%1.04%1.06%1.29%1.47%0.98%1.31%1.56%1.69%1.72%1.83%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


UIM7.DE and CBUG.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UIM7.DE.

UIM7.DE tracks MSCI World, while CBUG.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UIM7.DE and 0.10% for CBUG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIM7.DE and CBUG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer