PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UHPIX vs. TEPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UHPIX vs. TEPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHPIX achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly lower than TEPIX's 29.52% return. Over the past 10 years, UHPIX has underperformed TEPIX with an annualized return of -30.99%, while TEPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.06% annualized return.


UHPIX

1D
-3.41%
1M
-21.05%
6M
28.14%
YTD
20.85%
1Y
-1.04%
3Y*
-21.49%
5Y*
-31.18%
10Y*
-30.99%
ALL TIME*
-30.65%

TEPIX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-5.01%
6M
28.32%
YTD
29.52%
1Y
51.11%
3Y*
-19.11%
5Y*
-12.96%
10Y*
11.06%
ALL TIME*
4.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

UHPIX vs. TEPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UHPIX
ProFunds UltraShort China
20.85%-49.82%-29.87%-26.13%-63.62%94.89%-64.76%-43.34%39.47%-57.67%
TEPIX
ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund
29.52%30.08%-71.46%91.81%-51.01%46.85%64.53%71.30%-5.89%49.17%

Correlation

The correlation between UHPIX and TEPIX is -0.39, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2008

-0.59

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between UHPIX and TEPIX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.59 to -0.39, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UHPIX vs. TEPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UHPIX
UHPIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
UHPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
UHPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

TEPIX
TEPIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TEPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TEPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UHPIX vs. TEPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UHPIXTEPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.21

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

1.90

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

4.96

-4.81

UHPIX vs. TEPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UHPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the TEPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHPIX and TEPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UHPIX vs. TEPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than TEPIX's maximum drawdown of -89.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHPIX and TEPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UHPIXTEPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-89.14%

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.69%

-24.64%

-15.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.64%

-85.79%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.64%

-85.79%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.49%

-85.79%

-12.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-64.01%

-35.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.46%

-49.94%

-43.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.19%

9.39%

+11.80%

Volatility

UHPIX vs. TEPIX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) have volatilities of 13.79% and 14.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UHPIXTEPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.79%

14.31%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.31%

32.80%

+5.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.45%

38.48%

+14.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.00%

52.82%

+29.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

228.56%

44.79%

+183.77%

UHPIX vs. TEPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UHPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than TEPIX's 1.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

UHPIX vs. TEPIX - Dividend Comparison

UHPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than TEPIX's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TEPIX
ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund
2.49%3.22%0.00%0.37%0.00%0.90%2.31%0.00%0.23%
UHPIX
ProFunds UltraShort China
3.55%4.29%0.00%3.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.55%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UHPIX and TEPIX have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEPIX has higher volatility (14.31%) compared to UHPIX (13.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHPIX dropped -99.98% vs TEPIX's -89.14%.

TEPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UHPIX and TEPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer