UGPIX vs. UMPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) and ProFunds UltraMid Cap Fund (UMPIX).
UGPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Feb 3, 2008. UMPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Feb 6, 2000.
Performance
UGPIX vs. UMPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UGPIX vs. UMPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | -27.95% | 36.28% | -21.79% | -11.49% | -53.03% | -73.86% | 76.47% | 40.07% | -46.51% | 105.73% |
UMPIX ProFunds UltraMid Cap Fund | -2.94% | 3.62% | 17.08% | 22.37% | -32.05% | 55.65% | 5.21% | 48.88% | -26.37% | 23.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGPIX achieves a -27.95% return, which is significantly lower than UMPIX's -2.94% return. Over the past 10 years, UGPIX has underperformed UMPIX with an annualized return of -14.29%, while UMPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.92% annualized return.
UGPIX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -18.68%
- YTD
- -27.95%
- 6M
- -48.28%
- 1Y
- -30.96%
- 3Y*
- -15.66%
- 5Y*
- -37.37%
- 10Y*
- -14.29%
UMPIX
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- -16.14%
- YTD
- -2.94%
- 6M
- -1.88%
- 1Y
- 16.94%
- 3Y*
- 11.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UGPIX vs. UMPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGPIX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than UMPIX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UGPIX vs. UMPIX — Risk / Return Rank
UGPIX
UMPIX
UGPIX vs. UMPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) and ProFunds UltraMid Cap Fund (UMPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UGPIX | UMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | 0.42 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | 0.87 | -1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.12 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 0.48 | -1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 1.90 | -3.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UGPIX | UMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 0.42 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.10 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.26 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.20 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between UGPIX and UMPIX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UGPIX vs. UMPIX - Dividend Comparison
UGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than UMPIX's 0.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | 8.39% | 6.05% | 2.91% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.77% |
UMPIX ProFunds UltraMid Cap Fund | 0.19% | 0.19% | 1.20% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 9.49% | 0.00% | 2.07% | 0.14% | 2.33% |
Drawdowns
UGPIX vs. UMPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, which is greater than UMPIX's maximum drawdown of -85.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGPIX and UMPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGPIX | UMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.66% | -85.51% | -14.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.12% | -26.94% | -24.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.52% | -44.80% | -53.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.10% | -69.51% | -29.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.95% | -17.70% | -80.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.60% | -22.16% | -60.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.70% | 6.85% | +16.85% |
Volatility
UGPIX vs. UMPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a higher volatility of 15.79% compared to ProFunds UltraMid Cap Fund (UMPIX) at 11.53%. This indicates that UGPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UGPIX | UMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.79% | 11.53% | +4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.85% | 22.98% | +13.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.63% | 41.76% | +15.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 390.11% | 39.50% | +350.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 277.87% | 41.85% | +236.02% |