UGPIX vs. UJPIX
UGPIX (ProFunds UltraChina) and UJPIX (ProFunds UltraJapan Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, UGPIX returned 7.16%/yr vs 30.79%/yr for UJPIX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UGPIX charges 1.74%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for UJPIX.
Performance
UGPIX vs. UJPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGPIX achieves a -44.26% return, which is significantly lower than UJPIX's 79.83% return. Over the past 10 years, UGPIX has underperformed UJPIX with an annualized return of 7.16%, while UJPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 30.79% annualized return.
UGPIX
- 1D
- -3.36%
- 1M
- -22.93%
- YTD
- -44.26%
- 6M
- -45.24%
- 1Y
- -38.94%
- 3Y*
- -12.92%
- 5Y*
- -2.71%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
UJPIX
- 1D
- -10.78%
- 1M
- 17.17%
- YTD
- 79.83%
- 6M
- 80.02%
- 1Y
- 203.80%
- 3Y*
- 57.51%
- 5Y*
- 37.10%
- 10Y*
- 30.79%
UGPIX vs. UJPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | -44.26% | 36.28% | -21.79% | 785.09% | -53.03% | -73.86% | 76.47% | 40.07% | -46.51% | 105.73% |
UJPIX ProFunds UltraJapan Fund | 79.83% | 60.72% | 28.67% | 70.81% | -21.63% | 6.44% | 23.36% | 40.42% | -25.61% | 39.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGPIX and UJPIX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2000 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, UGPIX and UJPIX have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGPIX vs. UJPIX — Risk / Return Rank
UGPIX
UJPIX
UGPIX vs. UJPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) and ProFunds UltraJapan Fund (UJPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UGPIX | UJPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.51 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 7.66 | -8.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | 25.51 | -26.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UGPIX vs. UJPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGPIX drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, which is greater than UJPIX's maximum drawdown of -89.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGPIX and UJPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGPIX | UJPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.56% | -89.83% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.18% | -27.11% | -35.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.18% | -43.92% | -18.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.61% | -43.92% | -48.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.22% | -56.99% | -39.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.15% | -10.78% | -73.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.75% | -49.83% | -29.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.71% | 8.13% | +23.58% |
Volatility
UGPIX vs. UJPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) is 12.15%, while ProFunds UltraJapan Fund (UJPIX) has a volatility of 24.51%. This indicates that UGPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UJPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGPIX | UJPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.15% | 24.51% | -12.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.16% | 42.51% | -5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.21% | 52.90% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 388.15% | 42.97% | +345.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 276.55% | 41.47% | +235.08% |
UGPIX vs. UJPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGPIX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is lower than UJPIX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
UGPIX vs. UJPIX - Dividend Comparison
UGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.85%, less than UJPIX's 22.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | 10.85% | 6.05% | 2.91% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.77% |
UJPIX ProFunds UltraJapan Fund | 22.08% | 39.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UGPIX and UJPIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UJPIX has higher volatility (24.51%) compared to UGPIX (12.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGPIX dropped -98.56% vs UJPIX's -89.83%.
UJPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.93 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UGPIX and UJPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer