PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UGPIX vs. RYEUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UGPIX vs. RYEUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) and Rydex Europe 1.25x Strategy Fund (RYEUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGPIX achieves a -25.02% return, which is significantly lower than RYEUX's 6.21% return. Over the past 10 years, UGPIX has underperformed RYEUX with an annualized return of -13.12%, while RYEUX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.19% annualized return.


UGPIX

1D
4.53%
1M
-6.19%
YTD
-25.02%
6M
-28.64%
1Y
-11.24%
3Y*
-5.13%
5Y*
-34.94%
10Y*
-13.12%

RYEUX

1D
0.55%
1M
4.52%
YTD
6.21%
6M
8.69%
1Y
19.06%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
8.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UGPIX vs. RYEUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UGPIX
ProFunds UltraChina
-25.02%36.28%-21.79%-11.49%-53.03%-73.86%76.47%40.07%-46.51%105.73%
RYEUX
Rydex Europe 1.25x Strategy Fund
6.21%32.95%-2.61%19.53%-12.87%18.73%0.35%29.80%-18.72%28.14%

Correlation

The correlation between UGPIX and RYEUX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.24

The correlation between UGPIX and RYEUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UGPIX vs. RYEUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UGPIX
UGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
UGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

RYEUX
RYEUX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
RYEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RYEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UGPIX vs. RYEUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) and Rydex Europe 1.25x Strategy Fund (RYEUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UGPIXRYEUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.17

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

1.20

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.34

4.05

-4.39

UGPIX vs. RYEUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGPIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the RYEUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGPIX and RYEUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UGPIXRYEUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

0.93

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.39

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

0.36

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.04

-0.10

Drawdowns

UGPIX vs. RYEUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, which is greater than RYEUX's maximum drawdown of -76.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGPIX and RYEUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UGPIXRYEUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.66%

-76.19%

-23.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.67%

-15.24%

-37.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.13%

-18.54%

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.24%

-33.39%

-64.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.10%

-42.08%

-57.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.87%

-4.02%

-93.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.71%

-37.33%

-45.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.73%

4.50%

+24.23%

Volatility

UGPIX vs. RYEUX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a higher volatility of 18.51% compared to Rydex Europe 1.25x Strategy Fund (RYEUX) at 7.42%. This indicates that UGPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYEUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UGPIXRYEUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.51%

7.42%

+11.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.57%

16.30%

+20.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.09%

19.59%

+32.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

390.11%

21.03%

+369.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

277.98%

22.59%

+255.39%

UGPIX vs. RYEUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UGPIX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than RYEUX's 1.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

UGPIX vs. RYEUX - Dividend Comparison

UGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than RYEUX's 5.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYEUX
Rydex Europe 1.25x Strategy Fund
5.61%5.95%12.32%0.67%0.00%0.00%5.03%0.46%8.58%0.25%0.91%0.15%
UGPIX
ProFunds UltraChina
8.06%6.05%2.91%3.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.00%0.77%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UGPIX and RYEUX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGPIX has higher volatility (18.51%) compared to RYEUX (7.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGPIX dropped -99.66% vs RYEUX's -76.19%.

RYEUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UGPIX and RYEUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer