UGPIX vs. BLPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) and ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX).
UGPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Feb 3, 2008. BLPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Nov 30, 1997.
Performance
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | -27.95% | 36.28% | -21.79% | -11.49% | -53.03% | -73.86% | 76.47% | 40.07% | -46.51% | 105.73% |
BLPIX ProFunds Bull Investor Fund | -7.48% | 15.01% | 20.24% | 24.13% | -19.81% | 23.73% | 16.04% | 28.97% | -6.09% | 19.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGPIX achieves a -27.95% return, which is significantly lower than BLPIX's -7.48% return. Over the past 10 years, UGPIX has underperformed BLPIX with an annualized return of -14.29%, while BLPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.
UGPIX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -18.68%
- YTD
- -27.95%
- 6M
- -48.28%
- 1Y
- -30.96%
- 3Y*
- -15.66%
- 5Y*
- -37.37%
- 10Y*
- -14.29%
BLPIX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -7.83%
- YTD
- -7.48%
- 6M
- -5.44%
- 1Y
- 11.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGPIX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BLPIX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UGPIX vs. BLPIX — Risk / Return Rank
UGPIX
BLPIX
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) and ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UGPIX | BLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | 0.69 | -1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | 1.08 | -1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.17 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 0.83 | -1.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 3.84 | -5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UGPIX | BLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 0.69 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.49 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.63 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.33 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between UGPIX and BLPIX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Dividend Comparison
UGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than BLPIX's 1.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | 8.39% | 6.05% | 2.91% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.77% |
BLPIX ProFunds Bull Investor Fund | 1.71% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.98% | 6.68% | 5.79% | 1.64% | 0.62% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, which is greater than BLPIX's maximum drawdown of -57.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGPIX and BLPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGPIX | BLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.66% | -57.98% | -41.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.12% | -12.15% | -38.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.52% | -26.11% | -72.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.10% | -33.93% | -65.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.95% | -9.21% | -88.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.60% | -13.95% | -68.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.70% | 2.63% | +21.07% |
Volatility
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a higher volatility of 15.79% compared to ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX) at 4.24%. This indicates that UGPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UGPIX | BLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.79% | 4.24% | +11.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.85% | 9.08% | +27.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.63% | 18.09% | +39.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 390.11% | 16.90% | +373.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 277.87% | 17.70% | +260.17% |