UGPIX vs. BLPIX
UGPIX (ProFunds UltraChina) and BLPIX (ProFunds Bull Investor Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, UGPIX returned 8.16%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for BLPIX. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UGPIX charges 1.74%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for BLPIX.
Performance
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGPIX achieves a -30.01% return, which is significantly lower than BLPIX's 8.99% return. Over the past 10 years, UGPIX has underperformed BLPIX with an annualized return of 8.16%, while BLPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.47% annualized return.
UGPIX
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- 23.90%
- 6M
- -32.29%
- YTD
- -30.01%
- 1Y
- -22.37%
- 3Y*
- -16.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.16%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.09%
BLPIX
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 19.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | -30.01% | 36.28% | -21.79% | 785.09% | -53.03% | -73.86% | 76.47% | 40.07% | -46.51% | 105.73% |
BLPIX ProFunds Bull Investor Fund | 8.99% | 15.01% | 20.24% | 24.13% | -19.81% | 23.73% | 16.04% | 28.97% | -6.09% | 19.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGPIX and BLPIX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2000 | 0.19 |
Over the past year, UGPIX and BLPIX have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGPIX vs. BLPIX — Risk / Return Rank
UGPIX
BLPIX
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) and ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UGPIX | BLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.25 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 1.90 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 8.01 | -8.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGPIX drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, which is greater than BLPIX's maximum drawdown of -57.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGPIX and BLPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGPIX | BLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.56% | -57.98% | -40.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.51% | -9.21% | -56.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.51% | -18.98% | -46.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.22% | -26.11% | -62.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.22% | -33.93% | -62.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.09% | -1.71% | -78.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.77% | -13.80% | -65.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.97% | 2.18% | +34.79% |
Volatility
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a higher volatility of 13.34% compared to ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX) at 3.52%. This indicates that UGPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGPIX | BLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.34% | 3.52% | +9.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.85% | 10.11% | +27.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.05% | 12.86% | +40.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 387.78% | 17.05% | +370.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 276.47% | 17.74% | +258.73% |
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGPIX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BLPIX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UGPIX vs. BLPIX - Dividend Comparison
UGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.64%, more than BLPIX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLPIX ProFunds Bull Investor Fund | 1.45% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.98% | 6.68% | 5.79% | 1.64% | 0.62% | 0.00% |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | 8.64% | 6.05% | 2.91% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UGPIX and BLPIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGPIX has higher volatility (13.34%) compared to BLPIX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGPIX dropped -98.56% vs BLPIX's -57.98%.
BLPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UGPIX and BLPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer