PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UGOFX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UGOFX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund (UGOFX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGOFX achieves a 13.64% return, which is significantly higher than GQFPX's 7.81% return.


UGOFX

1D
0.58%
1M
3.31%
YTD
13.64%
6M
14.02%
1Y
24.19%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
10.64%

GQFPX

1D
0.15%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
7.81%
6M
9.15%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UGOFX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UGOFX
USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund
13.64%16.72%13.34%19.81%-15.68%7.41%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
7.81%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between UGOFX and GQFPX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between UGOFX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UGOFX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UGOFX
UGOFX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
UGOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UGOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UGOFX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund (UGOFX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UGOFXGQFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.29

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.01

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.06

8.39

+4.66

UGOFX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGOFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGOFX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UGOFXGQFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.66

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.80

-0.37

Drawdowns

UGOFX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGOFX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGOFX and GQFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UGOFXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-16.95%

-21.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-5.24%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.22%

-10.57%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-4.80%

+4.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.38%

-3.01%

-4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.87%

-0.01%

Volatility

UGOFX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund (UGOFX) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.32%. This indicates that UGOFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UGOFXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

3.32%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

7.68%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.49%

9.52%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.14%

12.82%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

12.82%

+5.54%

UGOFX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UGOFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

UGOFX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

UGOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.81%, more than GQFPX's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.92%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UGOFX
USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund
17.81%20.24%3.46%1.77%8.60%24.98%4.13%4.16%4.48%1.99%1.44%1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


UGOFX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGOFX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to GQFPX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGOFX dropped -38.00% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

UGOFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UGOFX and GQFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer