PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UGL vs. DZZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UGL vs. DZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UGL vs. DZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
14.36%137.57%46.36%15.56%-7.59%-12.30%39.04%31.11%-8.02%22.50%
DZZ
DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes
-30.86%132.78%-35.06%-8.14%2.79%0.56%-37.13%-26.64%8.21%-21.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGL achieves a 14.36% return, which is significantly higher than DZZ's -30.86% return. Over the past 10 years, UGL has outperformed DZZ with an annualized return of 20.61%, while DZZ has yielded a comparatively lower -8.56% annualized return.


UGL

1D
3.30%
1M
-21.80%
YTD
14.36%
6M
37.39%
1Y
98.00%
3Y*
59.13%
5Y*
35.67%
10Y*
20.61%

DZZ

1D
0.95%
1M
9.48%
YTD
-30.86%
6M
75.80%
1Y
62.84%
3Y*
3.68%
5Y*
-3.13%
10Y*
-8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UGL vs. DZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UGL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DZZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UGL vs. DZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UGL
UGL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
UGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DZZ
DZZ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UGL vs. DZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UGLDZZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.78

0.38

+1.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.11

2.37

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

0.84

+1.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.76

1.44

+7.31

UGL vs. DZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the DZZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGL and DZZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UGLDZZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

0.38

+1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

-0.04

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

-0.14

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

-0.21

+0.64

Correlation

The correlation between UGL and DZZ is -0.83. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

UGL vs. DZZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither UGL nor DZZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

UGL vs. DZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGL drawdown since its inception was -75.93%, smaller than the maximum DZZ drawdown of -96.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGL and DZZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UGLDZZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.93%

-96.64%

+20.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.56%

-74.95%

+37.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.23%

-74.95%

+34.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.23%

-80.59%

+34.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.85%

-93.53%

+67.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.76%

-82.19%

+38.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.11%

43.55%

-32.44%

Volatility

UGL vs. DZZ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) has a higher volatility of 20.81% compared to DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) at 15.37%. This indicates that UGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UGLDZZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.81%

15.37%

+5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.09%

126.04%

-76.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.46%

168.01%

-112.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.70%

82.52%

-46.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.19%

63.36%

-31.17%