DZZ vs. OKLL
DZZ (DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes) and OKLL (Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DZZ is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%), while OKLL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. DZZ is passively managed, while OKLL is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. DZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for OKLL.
Performance
DZZ vs. OKLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DZZ achieves a -49.04% return, which is significantly lower than OKLL's -37.27% return.
DZZ
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- -18.98%
- YTD
- -49.04%
- 6M
- -44.25%
- 1Y
- 6.57%
- 3Y*
- -7.35%
- 5Y*
- -5.49%
- 10Y*
- -10.64%
OKLL
- 1D
- 19.41%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- YTD
- -37.27%
- 6M
- -65.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DZZ vs. OKLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | -49.04% | 104.80% |
OKLL Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF | -37.27% | -30.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between DZZ and OKLL is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DZZ vs. OKLL — Risk / Return Rank
DZZ
OKLL
DZZ vs. OKLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DZZ | OKLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.04 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DZZ | OKLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | -0.29 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
DZZ vs. OKLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DZZ drawdown since its inception was -96.64%, roughly equal to the maximum OKLL drawdown of -96.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DZZ and OKLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DZZ | OKLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.64% | -96.29% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.23% | -92.41% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.30% | -60.71% | -21.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.96% | — | — |
Volatility
DZZ vs. OKLL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DZZ | OKLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 169.46% | 204.41% | -34.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.64% | 204.41% | -120.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.06% | 204.41% | -140.35% |
DZZ vs. OKLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than OKLL's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
DZZ vs. OKLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DZZ nor OKLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DZZ and OKLL have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for OKLL.
DZZ and OKLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DZZ is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while OKLL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DZZ and 1.31% for OKLL.
Find the right allocation for DZZ and OKLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer