UGL vs. COPZ
UGL (ProShares Ultra Gold) and COPZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF) are both Leveraged Commodities funds. UGL is passively managed, while COPZ is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UGL vs. COPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UGL
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 51.67%
- 3Y*
- 53.18%
- 5Y*
- 27.00%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
COPZ
- 1D
- -6.96%
- 1M
- 32.69%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGL vs. COPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UGL ProShares Ultra Gold | -23.75% |
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF | -5.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGL and COPZ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGL vs. COPZ — Risk / Return Rank
UGL
COPZ
UGL vs. COPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UGL | COPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UGL | COPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | -0.17 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
UGL vs. COPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGL drawdown since its inception was -75.93%, which is greater than COPZ's maximum drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGL and COPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGL | COPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.93% | -49.79% | -26.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.56% | -21.65% | -14.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.63% | -28.52% | -15.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.35% | — | — |
Volatility
UGL vs. COPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGL | COPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.91% | 104.89% | -51.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.18% | 104.89% | -68.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.34% | 104.89% | -72.55% |
UGL vs. COPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UGL and COPZ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UGL vs. COPZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither UGL nor COPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UGL and COPZ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UGL and COPZ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UGL and COPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Defiance.
Find the right allocation for UGL and COPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer