PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UGL vs. ^XAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UGL vs. ^XAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) and PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGL achieves a -21.87% return, which is significantly lower than ^XAU's -10.42% return. Over the past 10 years, UGL has outperformed ^XAU with an annualized return of 14.39%, while ^XAU has yielded a comparatively lower 11.03% annualized return.


UGL

1D
-5.20%
1M
-10.54%
6M
-30.93%
YTD
-21.87%
1Y
21.38%
3Y*
42.32%
5Y*
23.26%
10Y*
14.39%

^XAU

1D
-2.36%
1M
-9.21%
6M
-21.08%
YTD
-10.42%
1Y
45.28%
3Y*
34.10%
5Y*
16.74%
10Y*
11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UGL vs. ^XAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
-21.87%137.57%46.36%15.56%-7.59%-12.30%39.04%31.11%-8.02%22.50%
^XAU
PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index
-10.42%149.51%9.14%4.00%-8.75%-8.14%34.86%51.32%-17.13%8.13%

Correlation

The correlation between UGL and ^XAU is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2008

0.74

The correlation between UGL and ^XAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UGL vs. ^XAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UGL
UGL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGL Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
UGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

^XAU
^XAU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
^XAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
^XAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XAU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UGL vs. ^XAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) and PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UGL^XAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.19

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

1.29

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

3.00

-2.02

UGL vs. ^XAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the ^XAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGL and ^XAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UGL vs. ^XAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGL drawdown since its inception was -75.93%, smaller than the maximum ^XAU drawdown of -83.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGL and ^XAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UGL^XAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.93%

-83.04%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.38%

-35.22%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.38%

-35.22%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.38%

-45.52%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.38%

-45.52%

-3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.33%

-34.81%

-14.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.63%

-39.74%

-3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.73%

15.11%

+6.62%

Volatility

UGL vs. ^XAU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU) at 14.16%. This indicates that UGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^XAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UGL^XAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.14%

14.16%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.71%

38.70%

+10.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.56%

47.01%

+8.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.94%

36.73%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.63%

36.47%

-3.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


UGL and ^XAU have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGL has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to ^XAU (14.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGL dropped -75.93% vs ^XAU's -83.04%.

^XAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UGL and ^XAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer