PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UGE vs. QULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UGE vs. QULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGE achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly lower than QULL's 13.30% return.


UGE

1D
-0.91%
1M
-3.18%
YTD
11.48%
6M
12.68%
1Y
0.71%
3Y*
5.80%
5Y*
-2.13%
10Y*
7.78%

QULL

1D
0.56%
1M
3.06%
YTD
13.30%
6M
14.07%
1Y
34.31%
3Y*
32.06%
5Y*
15.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UGE vs. QULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UGE
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
11.48%-5.21%16.40%2.38%-46.78%32.16%
QULL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN
13.30%17.61%38.03%57.07%-42.00%51.36%

Correlation

The correlation between UGE and QULL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between UGE and QULL has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UGE vs. QULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UGE
UGE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
UGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
UGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

QULL
QULL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
QULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
QULL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
QULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QULL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UGE vs. QULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UGEQULLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.25

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

1.87

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.07

8.27

-8.21

UGE vs. QULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGE Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the QULL Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGE and QULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UGEQULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

1.41

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.45

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.55

-0.21

Drawdowns

UGE vs. QULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGE drawdown since its inception was -71.36%, which is greater than QULL's maximum drawdown of -51.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGE and QULL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UGEQULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.36%

-51.83%

-19.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.95%

-18.43%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.80%

-36.82%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.55%

-51.83%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.02%

-1.70%

-35.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-14.03%

-4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.54%

4.16%

+6.38%

Volatility

UGE vs. QULL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) at 4.67%. This indicates that UGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UGEQULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

4.67%

+3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.62%

18.88%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.05%

24.52%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.32%

35.62%

-4.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.10%

35.12%

-2.02%

UGE vs. QULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UGE and QULL have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

UGE vs. QULL - Dividend Comparison

UGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, while QULL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QULL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UGE
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
2.19%2.54%1.43%1.20%0.74%0.20%0.41%0.86%0.76%0.68%0.76%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


UGE and QULL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGE has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to QULL (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGE dropped -71.36% vs QULL's -51.83%.

On 5-year performance, QULL leads with 15.94% vs -2.13% for UGE. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QULL has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QULL has performed better with a 15.94% return vs -2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UGE and QULL have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.00% for QULL.

UGE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while QULL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and UBS.

QULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UGE and QULL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer