UGE vs. NBIG
UGE (ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UGE is passively managed, while NBIG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. UGE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.
Performance
UGE vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGE achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 487.61% return.
UGE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- 9.38%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- -2.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.97%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.73%
NBIG
- 1D
- 6.23%
- 1M
- 96.57%
- YTD
- 487.61%
- 6M
- 268.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGE vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 9.38% | -3.73% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 487.61% | -62.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGE and NBIG is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGE vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank
UGE
NBIG
UGE vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UGE | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UGE | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.38 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
UGE vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGE drawdown since its inception was -71.36%, smaller than the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGE and NBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGE | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.36% | -75.83% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.21% | -3.94% | -34.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -42.82% | +24.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.46% | — | — |
Volatility
UGE vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGE | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.97% | 200.64% | -175.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.30% | 200.64% | -169.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.07% | 200.64% | -167.57% |
UGE vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UGE vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison
UGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 2.23% | 2.54% | 1.43% | 1.20% | 0.74% | 0.20% | 0.41% | 0.86% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.76% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UGE and NBIG have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UGE.
UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UGE and 0.75% for NBIG.
Find the right allocation for UGE and NBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer