PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UGE vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UGE vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGE achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's 6.57% return.


UGE

1D
1.09%
1M
0.41%
6M
-2.98%
YTD
17.97%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
6.30%
5Y*
-2.42%
10Y*
8.02%
ALL TIME*
11.27%

IFED

1D
0.00%
1M
10.34%
6M
12.77%
YTD
6.57%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$121.94K$80.88K$45.76K
$1.04M$851.07K$1.08M

UGE vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UGE
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
17.97%-5.21%16.40%2.38%-46.78%25.92%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
6.57%15.02%23.04%20.78%-1.46%8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between UGE and IFED is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021

0.43

The correlation between UGE and IFED shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UGE vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UGE
UGE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UGE vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UGEIFEDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.11

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

0.46

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.86

1.43

-0.57

UGE vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGE Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is comparable to the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGE and IFED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UGE vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGE drawdown since its inception was -71.36%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGE and IFED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UGEIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.36%

-22.36%

-49.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.95%

-20.18%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.81%

-22.36%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.35%

-10.51%

-22.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.86%

-5.85%

-13.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.59%

6.50%

+5.09%

Volatility

UGE vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) is 11.70%, while ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) has a volatility of 24.37%. This indicates that UGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UGEIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.70%

24.37%

-12.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.05%

28.12%

-5.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.29%

29.47%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.87%

22.59%

+9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.26%

22.59%

+10.67%

UGE vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

UGE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

UGE vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

UGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UGE
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
2.07%2.54%1.43%1.20%0.74%0.20%0.41%0.86%0.76%0.68%0.76%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


UGE and IFED have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFED has higher volatility (24.37%) compared to UGE (11.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGE dropped -71.36% vs IFED's -22.36%.

On 3-year performance, IFED leads with 18.28% vs 6.30% for UGE. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, UGE has been the lower-risk option at 11.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IFED has performed better with a 18.28% return vs 6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UGE.

UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.

UGE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UGE and 0.45% for IFED.

UGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UGE and IFED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer