PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UGA vs. KAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UGA vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGA achieves a 91.06% return, which is significantly higher than KAPR's 13.09% return.


UGA

1D
-0.01%
1M
14.56%
6M
70.02%
YTD
91.06%
1Y
88.12%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
25.78%
10Y*
18.03%
ALL TIME*
4.82%

KAPR

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.08%
6M
11.66%
YTD
13.09%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$147.78K$281.73K$305.41K
$6.47M$5.01M$4.85M

UGA vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
91.06%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%140.22%
KAPR
Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April
13.09%7.42%12.10%15.36%-8.14%2.48%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between UGA and KAPR is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2020

0.14

The correlation between UGA and KAPR shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UGA vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

KAPR
KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UGA vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UGAKAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.70

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

8.50

-4.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.57

42.63

-31.06

UGA vs. KAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGA Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the KAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGA and KAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UGA vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGA drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than KAPR's maximum drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGA and KAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UGAKAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.59%

-16.91%

-69.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.32%

-2.52%

-17.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.68%

-16.84%

-9.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

-16.91%

-21.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.63%

-0.36%

-5.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.53%

-3.83%

-32.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.26%

0.50%

+6.76%

Volatility

UGA vs. KAPR - Volatility Comparison

United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a higher volatility of 11.28% compared to Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) at 1.52%. This indicates that UGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UGAKAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.28%

1.52%

+9.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.98%

4.77%

+27.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.11%

6.53%

+29.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.60%

11.69%

+22.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.26%

11.56%

+25.70%

UGA vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

UGA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than KAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

UGA vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither UGA nor KAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UGA and KAPR have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.28%) compared to KAPR (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGA dropped -86.59% vs KAPR's -16.91%.

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 25.78% vs 7.81% for KAPR. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KAPR.

UGA and KAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

UGA is categorized as Oil & Gas, while KAPR is Defined Outcome. UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline, while KAPR tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UGA and 0.79% for KAPR.

KAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UGA and KAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer