PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UFSD.L vs. ISAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UFSD.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (UFSD.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with UFSD.L having a 11.83% return and ISAC.L slightly lower at 11.54%.


UFSD.L

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.86%
YTD
11.83%
6M
12.19%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*

ISAC.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.51%
YTD
11.54%
6M
12.71%
1Y
28.36%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
12.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UFSD.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UFSD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
11.83%18.04%22.38%17.71%-16.20%25.12%10.42%25.31%-10.95%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.54%22.36%17.81%22.57%-18.16%18.85%15.66%25.77%-10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between UFSD.L and ISAC.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2018

0.92

The correlation between UFSD.L and ISAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

UFSD.L vs. ISAC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UFSD.L
ISAC.L

Technology

39.6%
33.9%

Financial Services

11.8%
17.3%

Communication Services

11.0%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
8.5%

Healthcare

8.7%
7.8%

Industrials

5.0%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.4%

Energy

3.8%
3.6%

Utilities

2.2%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.5%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.2%

Technology

UFSD.L
39.6%
ISAC.L
33.9%

Financial Services

UFSD.L
11.8%
ISAC.L
17.3%

Communication Services

UFSD.L
11.0%
ISAC.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

UFSD.L
10.7%
ISAC.L
8.5%

Healthcare

UFSD.L
8.7%
ISAC.L
7.8%

Industrials

UFSD.L
5.0%
ISAC.L
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

UFSD.L
4.2%
ISAC.L
4.4%

Energy

UFSD.L
3.8%
ISAC.L
3.6%

Utilities

UFSD.L
2.2%
ISAC.L
2.2%

Basic Materials

UFSD.L
1.5%
ISAC.L
2.9%

Real Estate

UFSD.L
1.3%
ISAC.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UFSD.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFSD.L
UFSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UFSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
UFSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFSD.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (UFSD.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UFSD.LISAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.43

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

3.27

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.45

13.72

+1.74

UFSD.L vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFSD.L and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UFSD.LISAC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.31

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.73

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.75

-0.10

Drawdowns

UFSD.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFSD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.77%, which is greater than ISAC.L's maximum drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFSD.L and ISAC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UFSD.LISAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.77%

-33.82%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-8.77%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.36%

-16.56%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.86%

-26.07%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-0.72%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-4.69%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

2.10%

-0.23%

Volatility

UFSD.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (UFSD.L) is 3.36%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that UFSD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UFSD.LISAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

3.84%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

9.77%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.62%

12.40%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

15.57%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

15.95%

+1.64%

UFSD.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UFSD.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

UFSD.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

UFSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UFSD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.80%0.89%0.86%1.12%1.51%0.75%1.11%1.41%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, UFSD.L and ISAC.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ISAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UFSD.L.

UFSD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. UFSD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UFSD.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UFSD.L and ISAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer