PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UFPT vs. STRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UFPT vs. STRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFPT achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 180.50% return. Over the past 10 years, UFPT has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 27.36%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 67.37% annualized return.


UFPT

1D
-1.53%
1M
7.17%
YTD
5.81%
6M
7.06%
1Y
-0.98%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
32.56%
10Y*
27.36%

STRL

1D
2.44%
1M
0.55%
YTD
180.50%
6M
172.57%
1Y
320.41%
3Y*
152.83%
5Y*
104.12%
10Y*
67.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UFPT vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UFPT
UFP Technologies, Inc.
5.81%-9.19%42.12%45.93%67.79%50.77%-6.07%65.15%8.06%9.23%
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
180.50%81.79%91.57%168.08%24.71%41.32%32.17%29.29%-33.11%92.43%

Correlation

The correlation between UFPT and STRL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.16

The correlation between UFPT and STRL shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UFPT:

$1.83B

STRL:

$26.66B

EPS

UFPT:

$8.81

STRL:

$11.19

PE Ratio

UFPT:

26.67

STRL:

76.77

PEG Ratio

UFPT:

0.50

STRL:

1.63

PS Ratio

UFPT:

3.01

STRL:

9.22

PB Ratio

UFPT:

4.17

STRL:

22.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

UFPT:

$608.85M

STRL:

$2.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UFPT:

$172.62M

STRL:

$664.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

UFPT:

$111.39M

STRL:

$429.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UFPT vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFPT
UFPT Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
UFPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFPT Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UFPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFPT Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

STRL
STRL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFPT vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UFPTSTRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.54

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

10.41

-10.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.06

28.52

-28.58

UFPT vs. STRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the STRL Sharpe Ratio of 3.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFPT and STRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UFPT vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFPT drawdown since its inception was -88.53%, roughly equal to the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFPT and STRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UFPTSTRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.53%

-92.51%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.69%

-31.02%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.31%

-47.67%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.31%

-47.67%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.31%

-59.60%

+11.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.45%

-13.56%

-20.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.24%

-46.29%

+14.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.84%

11.30%

+5.54%

Volatility

UFPT vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) is 8.18%, while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 27.60%. This indicates that UFPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UFPTSTRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.18%

27.60%

-19.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.29%

65.26%

-34.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.49%

82.41%

-38.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.23%

57.29%

-13.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.56%

53.58%

-14.02%

Dividends

UFPT vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison

Neither UFPT nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

UFPT vs. STRL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UFP Technologies, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
154.20M
825.68M
(UFPT) Total Revenue
(STRL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UFPT vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between UFP Technologies, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
28.8%
23.5%
Portfolio components
UFPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.36M and revenue of 154.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.

UFPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.37M and revenue of 154.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

UFPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 17.50M and revenue of 154.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UFPT and STRL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STRL has higher volatility (27.60%) compared to UFPT (8.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFPT dropped -88.53% vs STRL's -92.51%.

STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UFPT and STRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer