UFOX vs. ROKT
UFOX (Defiance Connective Technologies ETF) and ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UFOX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Connective Technologies Index, while ROKT is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UFOX returned 24.01%/yr vs 24.68%/yr for ROKT. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UFOX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ROKT.
Performance
UFOX vs. ROKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UFOX achieves a 62.60% return, which is significantly higher than ROKT's 46.55% return.
UFOX
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 21.96%
- YTD
- 62.60%
- 6M
- 59.53%
- 1Y
- 119.37%
- 3Y*
- 48.73%
- 5Y*
- 24.01%
- 10Y*
- —
ROKT
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- 12.62%
- YTD
- 46.55%
- 6M
- 60.20%
- 1Y
- 111.37%
- 3Y*
- 44.75%
- 5Y*
- 24.68%
- 10Y*
- —
UFOX vs. ROKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 62.60% | 34.83% | 34.11% | 21.83% | -27.26% | 25.68% | 29.78% | 6.81% |
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 46.55% | 50.56% | 27.89% | 14.41% | -0.81% | 4.63% | 7.99% | 19.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFOX and ROKT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between UFOX and ROKT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
UFOX vs. ROKT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UFOX
ROKT
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
UFOX
ROKT
Industrials
UFOX
ROKT
Communication Services
UFOX
ROKT
Real Estate
UFOX
ROKT
-
Basic Materials
UFOX
-
ROKT
-
Consumer Cyclical
UFOX
-
ROKT
-
Consumer Defensive
UFOX
-
ROKT
-
Energy
UFOX
-
ROKT
Financial Services
UFOX
-
ROKT
-
Healthcare
UFOX
-
ROKT
-
Utilities
UFOX
-
ROKT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFOX vs. ROKT — Risk / Return Rank
UFOX
ROKT
UFOX vs. ROKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UFOX | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.69 | 3.88 | +0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.33 | 4.47 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.57 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.87 | 9.82 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 43.09 | 35.81 | +7.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UFOX | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69 | 3.88 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.09 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.86 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
UFOX vs. ROKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFOX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum ROKT drawdown of -43.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFOX and ROKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFOX | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -43.16% | +9.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.04% | -11.40% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.14% | -23.46% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.90% | -23.46% | -10.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -8.82% | +6.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.01% | -6.75% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 3.12% | -0.34% |
Volatility
UFOX vs. ROKT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX) is 9.95%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a volatility of 13.10%. This indicates that UFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFOX | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.95% | 13.10% | -3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.25% | 24.98% | -4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.66% | 28.89% | -3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 22.78% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 25.14% | +0.08% |
UFOX vs. ROKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
UFOX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ROKT's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
UFOX vs. ROKT - Dividend Comparison
UFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than ROKT's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 0.27% | 0.41% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 1.79% | 0.48% | 0.74% | 0.16% |
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 0.36% | 0.56% | 0.79% | 1.40% | 1.63% | 1.17% | 0.99% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UFOX and ROKT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROKT has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to UFOX (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFOX dropped -33.90% vs ROKT's -43.16%.
On 5-year performance, ROKT leads with 24.68% vs 24.01% for UFOX. On fees, UFOX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, UFOX has been the lower-risk option at 9.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ROKT has performed better with a 24.68% return vs 24.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UFOX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ROKT.
UFOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.27% for ROKT.
UFOX is categorized as Technology Equities, while ROKT is Industrials Equities. UFOX tracks BlueStar Connective Technologies Index, while ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UFOX and 0.45% for ROKT.
UFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.69 vs 3.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UFOX and ROKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer