UFOX vs. MAGS
UFOX (Defiance Connective Technologies ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. UFOX is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UFOX returned 42.93%/yr vs 31.29%/yr for MAGS. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UFOX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
UFOX vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UFOX achieves a 48.96% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -1.59% return.
UFOX
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 48.96%
- 6M
- 46.16%
- 1Y
- 96.14%
- 3Y*
- 42.93%
- 5Y*
- 21.65%
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 23.92%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UFOX vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 48.96% | 34.83% | 34.11% | 12.64% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -1.59% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFOX and MAGS is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.67 |
The correlation between UFOX and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
UFOX vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UFOX
MAGS
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
UFOX
MAGS
Industrials
UFOX
MAGS
-
Communication Services
UFOX
MAGS
Real Estate
UFOX
MAGS
-
Basic Materials
UFOX
-
MAGS
-
Consumer Cyclical
UFOX
-
MAGS
Consumer Defensive
UFOX
-
MAGS
-
Energy
UFOX
-
MAGS
-
Financial Services
UFOX
-
MAGS
-
Healthcare
UFOX
-
MAGS
-
Utilities
UFOX
-
MAGS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFOX vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
UFOX
MAGS
UFOX vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UFOX | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.20 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.68 | 1.25 | +5.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.71 | 4.21 | +24.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UFOX vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFOX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFOX and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFOX | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -29.91% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.14% | -18.62% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.14% | -29.91% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.69% | -8.50% | -2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -4.72% | -4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 5.50% | -2.21% |
Volatility
UFOX vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX) has a higher volatility of 13.40% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 5.86%. This indicates that UFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFOX | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.40% | 5.86% | +7.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.05% | 15.07% | +7.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.78% | 20.30% | +7.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 25.97% | -0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 25.97% | -0.49% |
UFOX vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UFOX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
UFOX vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
UFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than MAGS's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.50% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.79% | 1.40% | 1.63% | 1.17% | 0.99% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UFOX and MAGS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFOX has higher volatility (13.40%) compared to MAGS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFOX dropped -33.90% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
On 3-year performance, UFOX leads with 42.93% vs 31.29% for MAGS. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UFOX has performed better with a 42.93% return vs 31.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UFOX.
MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.39% for UFOX.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UFOX and 0.29% for MAGS.
UFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UFOX and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer