UFO vs. SMH
UFO (Procure Space ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UFO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S-Network Space Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UFO returned 17.10%/yr vs 39.58%/yr for SMH. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UFO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
UFO vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UFO achieves a 58.40% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 75.55% return.
UFO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 19.20%
- YTD
- 58.40%
- 6M
- 86.32%
- 1Y
- 152.46%
- 3Y*
- 48.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.10%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- 24.01%
- YTD
- 75.55%
- 6M
- 76.44%
- 1Y
- 160.66%
- 3Y*
- 63.68%
- 5Y*
- 39.58%
- 10Y*
- 37.55%
UFO vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFO Procure Space ETF | 58.40% | 67.36% | 27.22% | -2.34% | -25.85% | 7.17% | -2.15% | 5.34% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 75.55% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 27.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFO and SMH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between UFO and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
UFO vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UFO
SMH
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
UFO
SMH
-
Communication Services
UFO
SMH
-
Technology
UFO
SMH
Basic Materials
UFO
-
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
UFO
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
UFO
-
SMH
-
Energy
UFO
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
UFO
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
UFO
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
UFO
-
SMH
-
Utilities
UFO
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFO vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
UFO
SMH
UFO vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Space ETF (UFO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UFO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.08 | 5.29 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.36 | 5.29 | -0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.73 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.94 | 11.02 | -4.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.87 | 42.34 | -19.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UFO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08 | 5.29 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 1.14 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.34 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
UFO vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFO drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFO and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.33% | -84.96% | +34.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.95% | -14.93% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.91% | -35.74% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.33% | -45.30% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.71% | 0.00% | -9.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -41.09% | +19.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.66% | 3.89% | +2.77% |
Volatility
UFO vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a higher volatility of 15.24% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 11.59%. This indicates that UFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.24% | 11.59% | +3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.78% | 24.29% | +6.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.59% | 30.57% | +7.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.80% | 35.02% | -5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.69% | 32.58% | -1.89% |
UFO vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
UFO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UFO vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.27% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UFO and SMH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFO has higher volatility (15.24%) compared to SMH (11.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFO dropped -50.33% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 39.58% vs 17.10% for UFO. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 11.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 39.58% return vs 17.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.
UFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
UFO is categorized as Global Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. UFO tracks S-Network Space Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProcureAM and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UFO and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.29 vs 4.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UFO and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer