UFO vs. NZAC
Compare and contrast key facts about Procure Space ETF (UFO) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC).
UFO and NZAC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UFO is a passively managed fund by ProcureAM that tracks the performance of the S-Network Space Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2019. NZAC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. It was launched on Nov 25, 2014. Both UFO and NZAC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UFO vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UFO vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFO Procure Space ETF | 15.94% | 67.36% | 27.22% | -2.34% | -25.85% | 7.17% | -2.15% | 5.34% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | -5.23% | 20.55% | 16.67% | 23.22% | -19.77% | 18.35% | 17.21% | 11.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UFO achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly higher than NZAC's -5.23% return.
UFO
- 1D
- 5.44%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 15.94%
- 6M
- 25.90%
- 1Y
- 104.04%
- 3Y*
- 34.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.04%
- 10Y*
- —
NZAC
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -5.23%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 17.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UFO vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
UFO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UFO vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank
UFO
NZAC
UFO vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Space ETF (UFO) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UFO | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.84 | 0.97 | +1.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.39 | 1.51 | +1.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.22 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.67 | 1.59 | +3.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | 6.70 | +8.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UFO | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 0.97 | +1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.48 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.54 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between UFO and NZAC is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
UFO vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison
UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than NZAC's 2.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.37% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 2.01% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.59% | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 2.00% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
UFO vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFO drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, which is greater than NZAC's maximum drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFO and NZAC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFO | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.33% | -33.72% | -16.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.95% | -10.85% | -11.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.33% | -28.31% | -22.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | -7.27% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.30% | -5.39% | -16.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.69% | 2.57% | +4.12% |
Volatility
UFO vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison
Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a higher volatility of 12.88% compared to SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) at 6.18%. This indicates that UFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NZAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UFO | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.88% | 6.18% | +6.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.59% | 10.07% | +18.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.91% | 17.91% | +19.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.81% | 16.73% | +12.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.19% | 17.09% | +13.10% |