UFO vs. ILS
UFO (Procure Space ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UFO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S-Network Space Index, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. UFO is passively managed, while ILS is actively managed. Over the past year, UFO returned 76.34% vs 7.81% for ILS. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. UFO charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.
Performance
UFO vs. ILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UFO achieves a 24.53% return, which is significantly higher than ILS's 2.27% return.
UFO
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -22.25%
- YTD
- 24.53%
- 6M
- 20.15%
- 1Y
- 76.34%
- 3Y*
- 39.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- —
ILS
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 2.63%
- 1Y
- 7.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UFO vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UFO Procure Space ETF | 24.53% | 75.99% |
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 2.27% | 3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFO and ILS is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFO vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank
UFO
ILS
UFO vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Space ETF (UFO) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UFO | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.69 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 14.18 | -11.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.06 | 52.13 | -43.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UFO vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFO drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFO and ILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFO | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.33% | -2.46% | -47.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.02% | -0.55% | -28.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.02% | 0.00% | -29.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.81% | -0.54% | -21.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.46% | 0.15% | +8.31% |
Volatility
UFO vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison
Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a higher volatility of 19.63% compared to Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) at 0.84%. This indicates that UFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFO | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.63% | 0.84% | +18.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.65% | 1.68% | +31.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.71% | 2.58% | +38.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.64% | 3.77% | +26.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.16% | 3.77% | +27.39% |
UFO vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UFO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
UFO vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison
UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than ILS's 8.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 8.05% | 6.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.34% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UFO and ILS have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFO has higher volatility (19.63%) compared to ILS (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFO dropped -50.33% vs ILS's -2.46%.
On 1-year performance, UFO leads with 76.34% vs 7.81% for ILS. On fees, UFO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ILS has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UFO has performed better with a 76.34% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UFO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.
ILS has the higher dividend yield at 8.05%, compared with 0.34% for UFO.
UFO is categorized as Global Equities, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ProcureAM and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UFO and 1.58% for ILS.
ILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UFO and ILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer