UFO vs. FDTS
UFO (Procure Space ETF) and FDTS (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - UFO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S-Network Space Index, while FDTS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UFO returned 13.50%/yr vs 10.78%/yr for FDTS. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UFO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDTS.
Performance
UFO vs. FDTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UFO achieves a 36.92% return, which is significantly higher than FDTS's 18.78% return.
UFO
- 1D
- -6.99%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- YTD
- 36.92%
- 6M
- 37.68%
- 1Y
- 105.58%
- 3Y*
- 41.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- —
FDTS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 6M
- 20.77%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 24.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
UFO vs. FDTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFO Procure Space ETF | 36.92% | 67.36% | 27.22% | -2.34% | -25.85% | 7.17% | -2.15% | 5.66% |
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 18.78% | 51.17% | 2.44% | 10.96% | -15.34% | 11.79% | 12.90% | 4.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFO and FDTS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.44 |
The correlation between UFO and FDTS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
UFO vs. FDTS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UFO
FDTS
Industrials
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
UFO
FDTS
Technology
UFO
FDTS
Communication Services
UFO
FDTS
Financial Services
UFO
FDTS
Basic Materials
UFO
-
FDTS
Consumer Cyclical
UFO
-
FDTS
Consumer Defensive
UFO
-
FDTS
Energy
UFO
-
FDTS
Healthcare
UFO
-
FDTS
Real Estate
UFO
-
FDTS
Utilities
UFO
-
FDTS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFO vs. FDTS — Risk / Return Rank
UFO
FDTS
UFO vs. FDTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Space ETF (UFO) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UFO | FDTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.58 | 3.43 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.05 | 11.78 | +2.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UFO vs. FDTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFO drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FDTS drawdown of -51.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFO and FDTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFO | FDTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.33% | -51.26% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.94% | -12.61% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.91% | -13.19% | -12.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.33% | -33.11% | -17.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.95% | -4.77% | -17.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.80% | -10.64% | -11.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.46% | 3.66% | +3.80% |
Volatility
UFO vs. FDTS - Volatility Comparison
Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a higher volatility of 20.43% compared to First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) at 8.44%. This indicates that UFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFO | FDTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.43% | 8.44% | +11.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.11% | 15.54% | +18.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.69% | 18.27% | +22.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.59% | 29.42% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.16% | 24.92% | +6.24% |
UFO vs. FDTS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UFO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FDTS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
UFO vs. FDTS - Dividend Comparison
UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than FDTS's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 2.53% | 2.94% | 3.94% | 2.90% | 3.71% | 3.01% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 1.96% | 2.08% | 1.78% | 1.73% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.31% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UFO and FDTS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFO has higher volatility (20.43%) compared to FDTS (8.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFO dropped -50.33% vs FDTS's -51.26%.
On 5-year performance, UFO leads with 13.50% vs 10.78% for FDTS. On fees, UFO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FDTS has been the lower-risk option at 8.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UFO has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 10.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UFO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.
FDTS has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.31% for UFO.
UFO is categorized as Global Equities, while FDTS is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. UFO tracks S-Network Space Index, while FDTS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: ProcureAM and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UFO and 0.80% for FDTS.
UFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UFO and FDTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer