UFIV vs. GIGB
UFIV (F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF) and GIGB (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UFIV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Current 5-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GIGB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UFIV returned 3.39%/yr vs 5.40%/yr for GIGB. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UFIV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for GIGB.
Performance
UFIV vs. GIGB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UFIV achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than GIGB's 0.99% return.
UFIV
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.17%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIGB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
UFIV vs. GIGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UFIV F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF | -0.46% | 6.89% | 1.09% | 1.80% |
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.99% | 7.58% | 1.68% | 5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFIV and GIGB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between UFIV and GIGB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFIV vs. GIGB — Risk / Return Rank
UFIV
GIGB
UFIV vs. GIGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) and Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UFIV | GIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.84 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.76 | 5.74 | -2.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UFIV vs. GIGB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFIV drawdown since its inception was -5.63%, smaller than the maximum GIGB drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFIV and GIGB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFIV | GIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -22.25% | +16.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -2.87% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.03% | -6.69% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -0.64% | -1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -5.60% | +4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.92% | +0.05% |
Volatility
UFIV vs. GIGB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) is 1.06%, while Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) has a volatility of 1.43%. This indicates that UFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFIV | GIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 1.43% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.28% | 3.23% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16% | 4.31% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.37% | 7.25% | -2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.37% | 7.66% | -3.29% |
UFIV vs. GIGB - Expense Ratio Comparison
UFIV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GIGB's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UFIV vs. GIGB - Dividend Comparison
UFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than GIGB's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.60% | 4.69% | 4.45% | 3.67% | 3.12% | 2.25% | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.31% | 1.55% |
UFIV F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF | 3.57% | 3.66% | 4.00% | 2.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UFIV and GIGB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIGB has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to UFIV (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFIV dropped -5.63% vs GIGB's -22.25%.
On 3-year performance, GIGB leads with 5.40% vs 3.39% for UFIV. On fees, GIGB is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, UFIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GIGB has performed better with a 5.40% return vs 3.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GIGB is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UFIV.
GIGB has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 3.57% for UFIV.
UFIV is categorized as Government Bonds, while GIGB is Corporate Bonds. UFIV tracks ICE BofA Current 5-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GIGB tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UFIV and 0.14% for GIGB.
GIGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UFIV and GIGB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer