PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEVM vs. QQQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEVM vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEVM achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 65.37% return.


UEVM

1D
-1.86%
1M
0.77%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.31%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*

QQQA

1D
2.20%
1M
23.31%
YTD
65.37%
6M
67.98%
1Y
88.43%
3Y*
34.58%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEVM vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
8.99%22.74%11.92%17.41%-14.60%-0.13%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
65.37%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between UEVM and QQQA is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.52

The correlation between UEVM and QQQA shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UEVM vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UEVM
QQQA

Financial Services

17.7%

-

Technology

15.5%
65.2%

Industrials

8.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.5%

-

Energy

5.2%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
4.2%

Basic Materials

4.6%

-

Healthcare

4.4%
7.8%

Utilities

4.1%

-

Real Estate

2.8%

-

Communication Services

2.0%
13.7%

Financial Services

UEVM
17.7%
QQQA

-

Technology

UEVM
15.5%
QQQA
65.2%

Industrials

UEVM
8.7%
QQQA

-

Consumer Defensive

UEVM
5.5%
QQQA

-

Energy

UEVM
5.2%
QQQA
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

UEVM
5.0%
QQQA
4.2%

Basic Materials

UEVM
4.6%
QQQA

-

Healthcare

UEVM
4.4%
QQQA
7.8%

Utilities

UEVM
4.1%
QQQA

-

Real Estate

UEVM
2.8%
QQQA

-

Communication Services

UEVM
2.0%
QQQA
13.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEVM vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEVM vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UEVMQQQADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.54

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

6.11

-3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

22.85

-14.20

UEVM vs. QQQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the QQQA Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEVM and QQQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UEVMQQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

3.41

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.57

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.59

-0.26

Drawdowns

UEVM vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than QQQA's maximum drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and QQQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEVMQQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-38.44%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-14.54%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-30.84%

+11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

-38.44%

+11.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

0.00%

-2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.67%

-15.68%

+4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.88%

-0.99%

Volatility

UEVM vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) is 5.15%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that UEVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEVMQQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

10.17%

-5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

22.18%

-10.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

26.05%

-10.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

25.83%

-9.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

25.77%

-7.38%

UEVM vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

UEVM vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison

UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than QQQA's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.06%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.05%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEVM and QQQA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to UEVM (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEVM dropped -45.44% vs QQQA's -38.44%.

On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 14.74% vs 7.55% for UEVM. On fees, UEVM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UEVM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQQA.

UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.

UEVM is categorized as Momentum, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.58% for QQQA.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEVM and QQQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer