PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEVM vs. ONEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEVM vs. ONEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEVM achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than ONEO's 17.85% return.


UEVM

1D
-1.86%
1M
0.77%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.31%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*

ONEO

1D
0.19%
1M
6.36%
YTD
17.85%
6M
18.38%
1Y
27.50%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEVM vs. ONEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
8.99%22.74%11.92%17.41%-14.60%11.09%3.77%10.71%-16.96%3.70%
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
17.85%10.61%15.01%15.64%-12.01%26.72%10.76%26.53%-12.41%5.15%

Correlation

The correlation between UEVM and ONEO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.62

The correlation between UEVM and ONEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

UEVM vs. ONEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UEVM
ONEO

Financial Services

17.7%
9.4%

Technology

15.5%
21.9%

Industrials

8.7%
18.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
5.4%

Energy

5.2%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
11.6%

Basic Materials

4.6%
4.7%

Healthcare

4.4%
9.5%

Utilities

4.1%
5.8%

Real Estate

2.8%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.0%
3.6%

Financial Services

UEVM
17.7%
ONEO
9.4%

Technology

UEVM
15.5%
ONEO
21.9%

Industrials

UEVM
8.7%
ONEO
18.0%

Consumer Defensive

UEVM
5.5%
ONEO
5.4%

Energy

UEVM
5.2%
ONEO
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

UEVM
5.0%
ONEO
11.6%

Basic Materials

UEVM
4.6%
ONEO
4.7%

Healthcare

UEVM
4.4%
ONEO
9.5%

Utilities

UEVM
4.1%
ONEO
5.8%

Real Estate

UEVM
2.8%
ONEO
2.9%

Communication Services

UEVM
2.0%
ONEO
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEVM vs. ONEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEO
ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEVM vs. ONEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UEVMONEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

3.75

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

14.86

-6.21

UEVM vs. ONEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the ONEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEVM and ONEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UEVMONEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.16

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.61

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.63

-0.30

Drawdowns

UEVM vs. ONEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than ONEO's maximum drawdown of -40.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and ONEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEVMONEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-40.86%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-7.37%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-19.72%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

-22.39%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

0.00%

-2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.67%

-5.00%

-6.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

1.86%

+1.03%

Volatility

UEVM vs. ONEO - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) at 3.77%. This indicates that UEVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEVMONEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

3.77%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

9.66%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

12.84%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

17.22%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

18.66%

-0.27%

UEVM vs. ONEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

UEVM vs. ONEO - Dividend Comparison

UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than ONEO's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
1.16%1.29%1.30%1.56%1.73%1.19%1.28%1.64%1.72%7.69%1.82%0.17%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.05%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEVM and ONEO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEVM has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to ONEO (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEVM dropped -45.44% vs ONEO's -40.86%.

On 5-year performance, ONEO leads with 10.50% vs 7.55% for UEVM. On fees, ONEO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ONEO has performed better with a 10.50% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.

UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.16% for ONEO.

UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.20% for ONEO.

ONEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEVM and ONEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer