PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEVM vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEVM vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEVM achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.


UEVM

1D
-1.86%
1M
0.77%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.31%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.51%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEVM vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
8.99%22.74%11.92%6.84%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.37%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between UEVM and IBIC is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023

0.02

The correlation between UEVM and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEVM vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEVM vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UEVMIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

2.24

-0.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

17.27

-14.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

67.45

-58.80

UEVM vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEVM and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UEVMIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

5.05

-3.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

3.49

-3.16

Drawdowns

UEVM vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEVMIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-0.90%

-44.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-0.26%

-9.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-0.13%

-2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.67%

-0.10%

-11.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

0.07%

+2.82%

Volatility

UEVM vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that UEVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEVMIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

0.33%

+4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

0.67%

+11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

0.90%

+14.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

1.58%

+14.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

1.58%

+16.81%

UEVM vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

UEVM vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.05%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEVM and IBIC have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEVM has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEVM dropped -45.44% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, UEVM leads with 24.92% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UEVM has performed better with a 24.92% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 3.05% for UEVM.

UEVM is categorized as Momentum, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEVM and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer