PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEVM vs. DFEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEVM vs. DFEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEVM achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly lower than DFEV's 22.81% return.


UEVM

1D
0.33%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
5.73%
6M
5.73%
1Y
19.29%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*

DFEV

1D
1.62%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
22.81%
6M
25.32%
1Y
46.17%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEVM vs. DFEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
5.73%22.74%11.92%17.41%-7.16%
DFEV
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
22.81%32.54%7.26%15.52%-6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between UEVM and DFEV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022

0.91

The correlation between UEVM and DFEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

UEVM vs. DFEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UEVM
DFEV

Financial Services

17.7%
16.8%

Technology

15.5%
28.6%

Industrials

8.7%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
3.4%

Energy

5.2%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
10.5%

Basic Materials

4.6%
7.4%

Healthcare

4.4%
3.3%

Utilities

4.1%
0.8%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.6%

Communication Services

2.0%
3.5%

Financial Services

UEVM
17.7%
DFEV
16.8%

Technology

UEVM
15.5%
DFEV
28.6%

Industrials

UEVM
8.7%
DFEV
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

UEVM
5.5%
DFEV
3.4%

Energy

UEVM
5.2%
DFEV
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

UEVM
5.0%
DFEV
10.5%

Basic Materials

UEVM
4.6%
DFEV
7.4%

Healthcare

UEVM
4.4%
DFEV
3.3%

Utilities

UEVM
4.1%
DFEV
0.8%

Real Estate

UEVM
2.8%
DFEV
1.6%

Communication Services

UEVM
2.0%
DFEV
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEVM vs. DFEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEV
DFEV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DFEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEVM vs. DFEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UEVMDFEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.47

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

4.09

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.60

15.04

-8.44

UEVM vs. DFEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the DFEV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEVM and DFEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UEVMDFEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.52

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

1.00

-0.70

Drawdowns

UEVM vs. DFEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than DFEV's maximum drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and DFEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEVMDFEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-18.49%

-26.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-11.35%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-17.94%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-6.42%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.66%

-4.65%

-7.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.08%

-0.15%

Volatility

UEVM vs. DFEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) is 5.55%, while Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) has a volatility of 9.67%. This indicates that UEVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEVMDFEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

9.67%

-4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.57%

16.20%

-3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

18.42%

-2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

16.68%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

16.68%

+1.73%

UEVM vs. DFEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEV's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

UEVM vs. DFEV - Dividend Comparison

UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than DFEV's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFEV
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.13%2.69%3.17%3.47%3.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.14%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEVM and DFEV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFEV has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to UEVM (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEVM dropped -45.44% vs DFEV's -18.49%.

On 3-year performance, DFEV leads with 22.74% vs 16.44% for UEVM. On fees, DFEV is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFEV has performed better with a 22.74% return vs 16.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFEV is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.

UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 2.13% for DFEV.

UEVM is categorized as Momentum, while DFEV is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.43% for DFEV.

DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEVM and DFEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer