PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UESD.L vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UESD.L vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc (UESD.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UESD.L is traded in GBP, while BIL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BIL values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UESD.L achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.86% return.


UESD.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.91%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*

BIL

1D
0.29%
1M
1.10%
YTD
1.86%
6M
1.23%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
2.05%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
2.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UESD.L vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UESD.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc
1.41%5.04%5.40%4.47%1.55%0.19%1.09%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.86%-3.27%7.03%-0.30%13.46%0.85%-15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between UESD.L and BIL is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2020

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UESD.L vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UESD.L
UESD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
UESD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UESD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
UESD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
UESD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
UESD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UESD.L vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc (UESD.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UESD.LBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

1.12

+0.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.99

0.89

+16.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

73.38

2.42

+70.96

UESD.L vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UESD.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.02, which is higher than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UESD.L and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UESD.LBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02

0.70

+3.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.20

0.53

+2.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.89

0.36

+2.52

Drawdowns

UESD.L vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UESD.L drawdown since its inception was -0.48%, smaller than the maximum BIL drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UESD.L and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UESD.LBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-20.05%

+19.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.26%

-5.19%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.26%

-9.84%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.41%

-15.90%

+15.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-6.29%

+6.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-9.41%

+9.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

1.91%

-1.85%

Volatility

UESD.L vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc (UESD.L) is 0.50%, while SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) has a volatility of 1.79%. This indicates that UESD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UESD.LBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.50%

1.79%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.87%

5.00%

-4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09%

6.61%

-5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.11%

8.56%

-7.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.06%

9.49%

-8.43%

UESD.L vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UESD.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UESD.L vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

UESD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
UESD.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc
5.64%4.63%5.37%4.49%1.21%0.24%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UESD.L and BIL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UESD.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UESD.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BIL.

UESD.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BIL is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for UESD.L and 0.14% for BIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UESD.L and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer