UEQU.DE vs. LYTR.DE
UEQU.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and LYTR.DE (Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc) are both Commodities funds - UEQU.DE tracks the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped while LYTR.DE tracks the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UEQU.DE returned 10.80%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for LYTR.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UEQU.DE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LYTR.DE.
Performance
UEQU.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UEQU.DE achieves a 25.53% return, which is significantly lower than LYTR.DE's 31.68% return. Over the past 10 years, UEQU.DE has outperformed LYTR.DE with an annualized return of 10.80%, while LYTR.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.05% annualized return.
UEQU.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 25.53%
- 6M
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 40.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 14.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
LYTR.DE
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 31.68%
- 6M
- 37.89%
- 1Y
- 63.68%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
UEQU.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UEQU.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 25.53% | 6.36% | 13.03% | -8.33% | 20.34% | 46.31% | -10.57% | 14.71% | -7.23% | 1.50% |
LYTR.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc | 31.68% | 17.61% | 13.31% | -15.11% | 27.05% | 52.41% | -19.51% | 14.38% | -6.19% | -11.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between UEQU.DE and LYTR.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2016 | 0.88 |
The correlation between UEQU.DE and LYTR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UEQU.DE vs. LYTR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UEQU.DE
LYTR.DE
UEQU.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) and Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UEQU.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.48 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.29 | 5.47 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.25 | 16.93 | -1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UEQU.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.83 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.91 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.49 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.12 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
UEQU.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UEQU.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.56%, smaller than the maximum LYTR.DE drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEQU.DE and LYTR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UEQU.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.56% | -67.69% | +37.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -11.84% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.66% | -17.04% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.44% | -30.29% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.56% | -44.60% | +14.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -3.72% | +2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.92% | -31.29% | +22.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 3.83% | -1.14% |
Volatility
UEQU.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) is 3.91%, while Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that UEQU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYTR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UEQU.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 5.20% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 20.33% | -7.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 22.94% | -7.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 19.40% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 18.20% | -1.79% |
UEQU.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UEQU.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than LYTR.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
UEQU.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither UEQU.DE nor LYTR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, UEQU.DE and LYTR.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LYTR.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYTR.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UEQU.DE.
UEQU.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped, while LYTR.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UEQU.DE and 0.30% for LYTR.DE.
Find the right allocation for UEQU.DE and LYTR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer