UEIPX vs. MBXAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

UEIPX (UBS Engage For Impact Fund) and MBXAX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - UEIPX is a Global Equities fund managed by UBS, while MBXAX is a Multistrategy fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UEIPX charges 0.85%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for MBXAX.

Performance

UEIPX vs. MBXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS Engage For Impact Fund (UEIPX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UEIPX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

MBXAX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -2.04%
• 6M: 8.41%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 1Y: 17.15%
• 3Y*: 9.84%
• 5Y*: 7.12%
• 10Y*: 7.41%
• ALL TIME*: 8.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

UEIPX vs. MBXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
UEIPX UBS Engage For Impact Fund	8.16%	20.69%	10.39%	16.46%	-22.35%	16.12%	16.94%	23.66%	-5.23%
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund	12.74%	4.13%	13.17%	-0.91%	7.46%	16.62%	-0.72%	13.59%	1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between UEIPX and MBXAX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2018	0.50

The correlation between UEIPX and MBXAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UEIPX vs. MBXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UEIPX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBXAX

MBXAX Risk / Return Rank: 89
MBXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MBXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
MBXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
MBXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
MBXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UEIPX vs. MBXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Engage For Impact Fund (UEIPX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UEIPX	MBXAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.13	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.13	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.40	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.77	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.56	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	UEIPX	MBXAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-31.75%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.66%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-2.69%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-4.00%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UEIPX	MBXAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.87%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	11.39%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	13.36%	—

UEIPX vs. MBXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEIPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXAX's 2.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

UEIPX vs. MBXAX - Dividend Comparison

UEIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.61%, while MBXAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.43%	2.02%	7.57%	0.00%	3.92%	4.96%	3.07%	3.35%	1.82%
UEIPX UBS Engage For Impact Fund	12.61%	13.64%	4.91%	0.66%	0.95%	11.99%	0.76%	2.68%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UEIPX and MBXAX in my portfolio?

UEIPX and MBXAX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.