PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UEFI.DE vs. CEMF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UEFI.DE vs. CEMF.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UEFI.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and CEMF.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc) are both Government Bonds funds - UEFI.DE tracks the Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index while CEMF.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. UEFI.DE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CEMF.DE.

Performance

UEFI.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEFI.DE achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than CEMF.DE's -1.42% return.

UEFI.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.01%
6M
0.27%
1Y
1.25%
3Y*
-0.59%
5Y*
-0.43%
10Y*
0.15%

CEMF.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEFI.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
UEFI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		1.01%0.67%
CEMF.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc		-1.42%2.59%

Correlation

The correlation between UEFI.DE and CEMF.DE is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc

Often compared with UEFI.DE:
UEFI.DE vs. XT01.DEUEFI.DE vs. MDBA.DEUEFI.DE vs. MDBU.DEUEFI.DE vs. TRDS.DEUEFI.DE vs. CBU0.DEUEFI.DE vs. TRD7.DEUEFI.DE vs. PR1T.DE
Often compared with CEMF.DE:
CEMF.DE vs. BBTR.DECEMF.DE vs. OM3M.DECEMF.DE vs. QDVP.DECEMF.DE vs. SPP3.DECEMF.DE vs. XUTD.DECEMF.DE vs. TRDL.DECEMF.DE vs. SPP7.DE

Return for Risk

UEFI.DE vs. CEMF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UEFI.DE
UEFI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
UEFI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
CEMF.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEFI.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UEFI.DECEMF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.04

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.23

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.08

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UEFI.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UEFI.DECEMF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.29

-0.29

Drawdowns

UEFI.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.63%, which is greater than CEMF.DE's maximum drawdown of -4.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEFI.DE and CEMF.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UEFI.DECEMF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.63%

-4.45%

-28.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.26%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.90%

-2.97%

-14.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-1.20%

-13.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.93%

—

—

Volatility

UEFI.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UEFI.DECEMF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.69%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.96%

4.62%

+17.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.03%

4.62%

+8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

4.62%

+11.98%

UEFI.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEFI.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMF.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UEFI.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Dividend Comparison

UEFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, while CEMF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEMF.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEFI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		2.64%1.93%2.25%2.54%1.33%0.82%1.66%1.68%2.29%1.74%0.76%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

UEFI.DE and CEMF.DE have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UEFI.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UEFI.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CEMF.DE.

UEFI.DE tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while CEMF.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for UEFI.DE and 0.10% for CEMF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEFI.DE and CEMF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer