PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEEG.DE vs. IS3N.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEEG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (UEEG.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEEG.DE achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 26.15% return.


UEEG.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
6M
-0.42%
YTD
-0.63%
1Y
1.29%
3Y*
2.37%
5Y*
-0.91%
10Y*

IS3N.DE

1D
2.11%
1M
-1.18%
6M
22.85%
YTD
26.15%
1Y
42.71%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEEG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UEEG.DE
iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-0.63%4.64%0.67%2.27%-9.47%-2.61%-0.20%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
26.15%17.14%13.88%7.20%-13.85%7.09%14.81%

Correlation

The correlation between UEEG.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2020

-0.01

The correlation between UEEG.DE and IS3N.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (5 years) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEEG.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEEG.DE
UEEG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UEEG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEEG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEEG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
UEEG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEEG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEEG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (UEEG.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UEEG.DEIS3N.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.40

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

4.04

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.38

13.47

-12.10

UEEG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEEG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEEG.DE and IS3N.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UEEG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEEG.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.77%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEEG.DE and IS3N.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEEG.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.77%

-35.06%

+21.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.30%

-10.52%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.22%

-19.18%

+15.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.90%

-21.99%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.99%

-4.56%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-9.24%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

3.16%

-2.22%

Volatility

UEEG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (UEEG.DE) is 0.95%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that UEEG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEEG.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

8.89%

-7.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

16.69%

-13.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60%

19.07%

-15.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.29%

16.62%

-12.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.03%

18.15%

-14.12%

UEEG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UEEG.DE and IS3N.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UEEG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UEEG.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UEEG.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UEEG.DE and IS3N.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

UEEG.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. UEEG.DE tracks FTSE World Broad Investment-Grade USD Multilateral Development Bank Bond Capped Index (EUR Hedged), while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI).

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEEG.DE and IS3N.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer