UDOW vs. RWM
UDOW (ProShares UltraPro Dow30) and RWM (ProShares Short Russell2000) are both exchange-traded funds - UDOW is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%), while RWM is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UDOW returned 23.01%/yr vs -11.67%/yr for RWM. At a correlation of -0.79, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UDOW vs. RWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a 22.92% return, which is significantly higher than RWM's -16.04% return. Over the past 10 years, UDOW has outperformed RWM with an annualized return of 23.01%, while RWM has yielded a comparatively lower -11.67% annualized return.
UDOW
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- YTD
- 22.92%
- 1Y
- 51.04%
- 3Y*
- 34.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 23.01%
RWM
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- -9.64%
- YTD
- -16.04%
- 1Y
- -23.91%
- 3Y*
- -11.15%
- 5Y*
- -6.63%
- 10Y*
- -11.67%
UDOW vs. RWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30 | 22.92% | 24.46% | 28.47% | 32.72% | -32.39% | 65.67% | -17.15% | 75.24% | -23.86% | 99.07% |
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000 | -16.04% | -9.40% | -5.91% | -10.43% | 18.34% | -17.90% | -31.04% | -19.83% | 11.57% | -13.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between UDOW and RWM is -0.76, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.79 |
The correlation between UDOW and RWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.80 to -0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
UDOW vs. RWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UDOW
RWM
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
UDOW
RWM
Technology
UDOW
RWM
-
Industrials
UDOW
RWM
-
Healthcare
UDOW
RWM
-
Consumer Cyclical
UDOW
RWM
-
Consumer Defensive
UDOW
RWM
-
Basic Materials
UDOW
RWM
-
Energy
UDOW
RWM
-
Communication Services
UDOW
RWM
-
Real Estate
UDOW
-
RWM
-
Utilities
UDOW
-
RWM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UDOW vs. RWM — Risk / Return Rank
UDOW
RWM
UDOW vs. RWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UDOW | RWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.81 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | -0.87 | +2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | -1.47 | +7.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UDOW vs. RWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, smaller than the maximum RWM drawdown of -95.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and RWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UDOW | RWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.29% | -95.61% | +15.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.07% | -27.57% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.83% | -43.12% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.79% | -43.12% | -12.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.29% | -72.51% | -7.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -95.52% | +92.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.30% | -74.15% | +59.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.90% | 16.33% | -8.43% |
Volatility
UDOW vs. RWM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) at 3.65%. This indicates that UDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UDOW | RWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 3.65% | +3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.66% | 14.15% | +14.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.53% | 19.28% | +17.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.29% | 22.57% | +21.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.67% | 23.07% | +28.60% |
UDOW vs. RWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UDOW and RWM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UDOW vs. RWM - Dividend Comparison
UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than RWM's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000 | 3.80% | 3.97% | 6.03% | 4.78% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.55% | 0.87% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30 | 1.09% | 1.38% | 0.95% | 0.95% | 0.83% | 0.26% | 0.19% | 0.61% | 0.73% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UDOW and RWM have a correlation of -0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UDOW has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to RWM (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDOW dropped -80.29% vs RWM's -95.61%.
On 10-year performance, UDOW leads with 23.01% vs -11.67% for RWM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, RWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UDOW has performed better with a 23.01% return vs -11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UDOW and RWM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
RWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 1.09% for UDOW.
UDOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RWM is Inverse Equities. UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%), while RWM tracks Russell 2000 (-100%).
UDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UDOW and RWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer