PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDOW vs. RWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDOW vs. RWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly higher than RWM's -13.83% return. Over the past 10 years, UDOW has outperformed RWM with an annualized return of 23.30%, while RWM has yielded a comparatively lower -11.85% annualized return.


UDOW

1D
-3.38%
1M
10.84%
YTD
12.27%
6M
12.78%
1Y
53.13%
3Y*
33.01%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
23.30%

RWM

1D
1.37%
1M
-3.30%
YTD
-13.83%
6M
-12.66%
1Y
-25.94%
3Y*
-12.10%
5Y*
-5.21%
10Y*
-11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDOW vs. RWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
12.27%24.46%28.47%32.72%-32.39%65.67%-17.15%75.24%-23.86%99.07%
RWM
ProShares Short Russell2000
-13.83%-9.40%-5.91%-10.43%18.34%-17.90%-31.04%-19.83%11.57%-13.61%

Correlation

The correlation between UDOW and RWM is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

-0.80

The correlation between UDOW and RWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.80 to -0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

UDOW vs. RWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDOW
RWM

Financial Services

27.2%
80.6%

Industrials

18.4%

-

Technology

17.1%

-

Healthcare

13.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Basic Materials

4.0%

-

Energy

2.4%

-

Communication Services

1.9%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

UDOW
27.2%
RWM
80.6%

Industrials

UDOW
18.4%
RWM

-

Technology

UDOW
17.1%
RWM

-

Healthcare

UDOW
13.1%
RWM

-

Consumer Cyclical

UDOW
11.6%
RWM

-

Consumer Defensive

UDOW
4.4%
RWM

-

Basic Materials

UDOW
4.0%
RWM

-

Energy

UDOW
2.4%
RWM

-

Communication Services

UDOW
1.9%
RWM

-

Real Estate

UDOW

-

RWM

-

Utilities

UDOW

-

RWM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDOW vs. RWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDOW
UDOW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
UDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

RWM
RWM Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
RWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWM Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
RWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWM Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDOW vs. RWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDOWRWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.79

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

-0.95

+2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

-1.65

+8.40

UDOW vs. RWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the RWM Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDOW and RWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDOWRWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

-1.37

+2.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

-0.23

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

-0.51

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

-0.49

+1.02

Drawdowns

UDOW vs. RWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, smaller than the maximum RWM drawdown of -95.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and RWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDOWRWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.29%

-95.47%

+15.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.07%

-27.26%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.83%

-41.38%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.79%

-41.38%

-14.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.29%

-73.72%

-6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

-95.41%

+92.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.39%

-74.04%

+59.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.90%

15.73%

-7.83%

Volatility

UDOW vs. RWM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) at 5.84%. This indicates that UDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDOWRWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

5.84%

+2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.61%

13.52%

+14.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.12%

19.07%

+17.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.19%

22.56%

+21.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.76%

23.11%

+28.65%

UDOW vs. RWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UDOW and RWM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

UDOW vs. RWM - Dividend Comparison

UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than RWM's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWM
ProShares Short Russell2000
4.12%3.97%6.03%4.78%0.39%0.00%0.20%1.55%0.87%0.07%0.00%0.00%
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
1.21%1.38%0.95%0.95%0.83%0.26%0.19%0.61%0.73%0.13%0.26%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDOW and RWM have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UDOW has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to RWM (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDOW dropped -80.29% vs RWM's -95.47%.

On 10-year performance, UDOW leads with 23.30% vs -11.85% for RWM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, RWM has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UDOW has performed better with a 23.30% return vs -11.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UDOW and RWM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

RWM has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 1.21% for UDOW.

UDOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RWM is Inverse Equities. UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%), while RWM tracks Russell 2000 (-100%).

UDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDOW and RWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer