UDOW vs. MULL
UDOW (ProShares UltraPro Dow30) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UDOW is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, UDOW returned 53.13% vs 6074.28% for MULL. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UDOW charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
UDOW vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.
UDOW
- 1D
- -3.38%
- 1M
- 10.84%
- YTD
- 12.27%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 53.13%
- 3Y*
- 33.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.75%
- 10Y*
- 23.30%
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UDOW vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30 | 12.27% | 24.46% | -10.25% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 936.86% | 558.51% | -40.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between UDOW and MULL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | 0.34 |
UDOW vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UDOW
MULL
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
UDOW
MULL
-
Industrials
UDOW
MULL
-
Technology
UDOW
MULL
Healthcare
UDOW
MULL
-
Consumer Cyclical
UDOW
MULL
-
Consumer Defensive
UDOW
MULL
-
Basic Materials
UDOW
MULL
-
Energy
UDOW
MULL
-
Communication Services
UDOW
MULL
-
Real Estate
UDOW
-
MULL
-
Utilities
UDOW
-
MULL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UDOW vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
UDOW
MULL
UDOW vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UDOW | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -45.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.89 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 116.34 | -114.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.75 | 390.40 | -383.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UDOW | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 46.71 | -45.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 7.45 | -6.92 |
Drawdowns
UDOW vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UDOW | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.29% | -72.29% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.07% | -53.09% | +25.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.38% | 0.00% | -3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.39% | -20.62% | +6.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.90% | 15.79% | -7.89% |
Volatility
UDOW vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) is 8.80%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that UDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UDOW | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.80% | 55.41% | -46.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.61% | 105.59% | -77.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.12% | 132.38% | -96.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.19% | 136.22% | -92.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.76% | 136.22% | -84.46% |
UDOW vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UDOW vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30 | 1.21% | 1.38% | 0.95% | 0.95% | 0.83% | 0.26% | 0.19% | 0.61% | 0.73% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UDOW and MULL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to UDOW (8.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDOW dropped -80.29% vs MULL's -72.29%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs 53.13% for UDOW. On fees, UDOW is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UDOW has been the lower-risk option at 8.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs 53.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UDOW is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
UDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UDOW and 1.50% for MULL.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UDOW and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer