UDOW vs. FAS
UDOW (ProShares UltraPro Dow30) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UDOW tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%) while FAS tracks the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UDOW returned 22.44%/yr vs 21.45%/yr for FAS. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UDOW charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FAS.
Performance
UDOW vs. FAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a 18.09% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -0.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UDOW having a 22.44% annualized return and FAS not far behind at 21.45%.
UDOW
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- YTD
- 18.09%
- 1Y
- 44.27%
- 3Y*
- 30.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.93%
- 10Y*
- 22.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 26.13%
FAS
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 1Y
- 7.81%
- 3Y*
- 37.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.85%
UDOW vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30 | 18.09% | 24.46% | 28.47% | 32.72% | -32.39% | 65.67% | -17.15% | 75.24% | -23.86% | 99.07% |
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF | -0.13% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between UDOW and FAS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.85 |
The correlation between UDOW and FAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
UDOW vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UDOW
FAS
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
UDOW
FAS
Industrials
UDOW
FAS
Technology
UDOW
FAS
Healthcare
UDOW
FAS
-
Consumer Cyclical
UDOW
FAS
-
Communication Services
UDOW
FAS
-
Consumer Defensive
UDOW
FAS
-
Basic Materials
UDOW
FAS
-
Energy
UDOW
FAS
-
Real Estate
UDOW
-
FAS
-
Utilities
UDOW
-
FAS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UDOW vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank
UDOW
FAS
UDOW vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UDOW | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.07 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 0.19 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 0.42 | +5.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UDOW vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, smaller than the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and FAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UDOW | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.29% | -91.61% | +11.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.07% | -40.88% | +12.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.83% | -43.10% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.79% | -66.88% | +11.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.29% | -85.99% | +5.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.09% | -8.36% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.30% | -31.02% | +16.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | 18.45% | -10.53% |
Volatility
UDOW vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) is 6.63%, while Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) has a volatility of 12.21%. This indicates that UDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UDOW | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.63% | 12.21% | -5.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.77% | 33.49% | -4.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.65% | 43.53% | -6.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.17% | 55.00% | -10.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.70% | 61.10% | -9.40% |
UDOW vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FAS's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
UDOW vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison
UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than FAS's 8.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF | 8.40% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30 | 1.14% | 1.38% | 0.95% | 0.95% | 0.83% | 0.26% | 0.19% | 0.61% | 0.73% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UDOW and FAS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAS has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to UDOW (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDOW dropped -80.29% vs FAS's -91.61%.
On 10-year performance, UDOW leads with 22.44% vs 21.45% for FAS. On fees, FAS is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, UDOW has been the lower-risk option at 6.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UDOW has performed better with a 22.44% return vs 21.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FAS is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UDOW.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 8.40%, compared with 1.14% for UDOW.
UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%), while FAS tracks Financial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UDOW and 0.88% for FAS.
UDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UDOW and FAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer