PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDOW vs. FAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDOW vs. FAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a 18.09% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -0.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UDOW having a 22.44% annualized return and FAS not far behind at 21.45%.


UDOW

1D
-1.73%
1M
0.98%
6M
9.75%
YTD
18.09%
1Y
44.27%
3Y*
30.32%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
22.44%
ALL TIME*
26.13%

FAS

1D
-1.04%
1M
14.28%
6M
2.58%
YTD
-0.13%
1Y
7.81%
3Y*
37.27%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
21.45%
ALL TIME*
13.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDOW vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
18.09%24.46%28.47%32.72%-32.39%65.67%-17.15%75.24%-23.86%99.07%
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF
-0.13%21.48%84.47%14.92%-43.19%116.59%-34.97%113.04%-33.84%67.37%

Correlation

The correlation between UDOW and FAS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.85

The correlation between UDOW and FAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

UDOW vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDOW
FAS

Financial Services

31.9%
98.2%

Industrials

8.9%
0.2%

Technology

8.4%
1.6%

Healthcare

6.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%

-

Communication Services

2.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

2.0%

-

Energy

1.1%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

UDOW
31.9%
FAS
98.2%

Industrials

UDOW
8.9%
FAS
0.2%

Technology

UDOW
8.4%
FAS
1.6%

Healthcare

UDOW
6.7%
FAS

-

Consumer Cyclical

UDOW
5.3%
FAS

-

Communication Services

UDOW
2.8%
FAS

-

Consumer Defensive

UDOW
2.0%
FAS

-

Basic Materials

UDOW
2.0%
FAS

-

Energy

UDOW
1.1%
FAS

-

Real Estate

UDOW

-

FAS

-

Utilities

UDOW

-

FAS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDOW vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDOW
UDOW Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
UDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
UDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FAS
FAS Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDOW vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UDOWFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.07

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

0.19

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

0.42

+5.18

UDOW vs. FAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the FAS Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDOW and FAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UDOW vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, smaller than the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and FAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDOWFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.29%

-91.61%

+11.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.07%

-40.88%

+12.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.83%

-43.10%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.79%

-66.88%

+11.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.29%

-85.99%

+5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.09%

-8.36%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.30%

-31.02%

+16.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.92%

18.45%

-10.53%

Volatility

UDOW vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) is 6.63%, while Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) has a volatility of 12.21%. This indicates that UDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDOWFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

12.21%

-5.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.77%

33.49%

-4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.65%

43.53%

-6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.17%

55.00%

-10.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.70%

61.10%

-9.40%

UDOW vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FAS's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDOW vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison

UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than FAS's 8.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF
8.40%8.21%0.76%1.77%0.91%0.60%0.47%0.62%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.00%
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
1.14%1.38%0.95%0.95%0.83%0.26%0.19%0.61%0.73%0.13%0.26%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDOW and FAS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAS has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to UDOW (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDOW dropped -80.29% vs FAS's -91.61%.

On 10-year performance, UDOW leads with 22.44% vs 21.45% for FAS. On fees, FAS is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, UDOW has been the lower-risk option at 6.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UDOW has performed better with a 22.44% return vs 21.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FAS is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UDOW.

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 8.40%, compared with 1.14% for UDOW.

UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%), while FAS tracks Financial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UDOW and 0.88% for FAS.

UDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDOW and FAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer