UDI vs. DFRA
UDI (USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund) and DFRA (Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. UDI is actively managed, while DFRA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UDI returned 17.17%/yr vs 11.30%/yr for DFRA. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UDI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for DFRA.
Performance
UDI vs. DFRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UDI achieves a 12.00% return, which is significantly higher than DFRA's 4.86% return.
UDI
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 12.00%
- 6M
- 11.67%
- 1Y
- 23.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFRA
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- 11.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UDI vs. DFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDI USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund | 12.00% | 14.23% | 17.07% | 6.35% | 3.14% |
DFRA Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF | 4.86% | 6.64% | 7.05% | 18.89% | -4.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between UDI and DFRA is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2022 | 0.73 |
The correlation between UDI and DFRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
UDI vs. DFRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UDI
DFRA
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
UDI
DFRA
-
Healthcare
UDI
DFRA
-
Energy
UDI
DFRA
Real Estate
UDI
DFRA
Utilities
UDI
DFRA
Technology
UDI
DFRA
Communication Services
UDI
DFRA
-
Basic Materials
UDI
DFRA
Consumer Defensive
UDI
DFRA
Industrials
UDI
DFRA
Consumer Cyclical
UDI
DFRA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UDI vs. DFRA — Risk / Return Rank
UDI
DFRA
UDI vs. DFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund (UDI) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UDI | DFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.13 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 0.85 | +3.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.83 | 2.48 | +13.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UDI vs. DFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UDI drawdown since its inception was -14.17%, smaller than the maximum DFRA drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDI and DFRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UDI | DFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.17% | -19.35% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.66% | -11.64% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.17% | -19.35% | +5.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -10.50% | +9.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -4.02% | +0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 3.97% | -2.48% |
Volatility
UDI vs. DFRA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund (UDI) is 3.37%, while Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that UDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UDI | DFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 4.19% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 13.19% | -6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 15.07% | -4.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 17.50% | -3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 17.50% | -3.48% |
UDI vs. DFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
UDI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DFRA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
UDI vs. DFRA - Dividend Comparison
UDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than DFRA's 4.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFRA Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF | 4.35% | 2.86% | 10.13% | 4.70% | 8.40% | 0.08% |
UDI USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund | 2.44% | 2.42% | 5.33% | 2.61% | 1.79% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UDI and DFRA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFRA has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to UDI (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDI dropped -14.17% vs DFRA's -19.35%.
On 3-year performance, UDI leads with 17.17% vs 11.30% for DFRA. On fees, UDI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, UDI has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UDI has performed better with a 17.17% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UDI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFRA.
DFRA has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 2.44% for UDI.
They also come from different issuers: USCF Advisers and Donoghue Forlines. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for UDI and 0.69% for DFRA.
UDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UDI and DFRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer