PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDEC vs. FFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDEC vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December (UDEC) and CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UDEC having a 6.52% return and FFTY slightly higher at 6.64%.


UDEC

1D
0.47%
1M
1.33%
6M
5.40%
YTD
6.52%
1Y
15.43%
3Y*
11.63%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.30%

FFTY

1D
0.35%
1M
-8.71%
6M
3.25%
YTD
6.64%
1Y
13.68%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
-3.22%
10Y*
5.49%
ALL TIME*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$850.81K$1.10M$1.54M
$499.11K$383.21K$1.53M

UDEC vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December
6.52%12.97%9.52%16.80%-9.44%6.44%6.72%1.00%
FFTY
CapForce IBD 50 ETF
6.64%23.38%18.36%12.40%-51.08%11.92%18.20%-1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between UDEC and FFTY is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2019

0.68

The correlation between UDEC and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

UDEC vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDEC
FFTY

Technology

37.9%
18.5%

Financial Services

11.7%
20.9%

Communication Services

10.0%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
3.6%

Healthcare

9.1%
43.7%

Industrials

8.4%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
1.0%

Energy

3.0%
2.6%

Utilities

2.3%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.5%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.6%

Technology

UDEC
37.9%
FFTY
18.5%

Financial Services

UDEC
11.7%
FFTY
20.9%

Communication Services

UDEC
10.0%
FFTY
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

UDEC
9.6%
FFTY
3.6%

Healthcare

UDEC
9.1%
FFTY
43.7%

Industrials

UDEC
8.4%
FFTY
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

UDEC
4.6%
FFTY
1.0%

Energy

UDEC
3.0%
FFTY
2.6%

Utilities

UDEC
2.3%
FFTY
2.1%

Real Estate

UDEC
1.9%
FFTY
0.5%

Basic Materials

UDEC
1.7%
FFTY
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDEC vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UDEC
UDEC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
UDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UDEC vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December (UDEC) and CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UDECFFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.09

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

0.59

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.73

1.43

+15.30

UDEC vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDEC and FFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UDEC vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDEC drawdown since its inception was -13.37%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDEC and FFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDECFFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-59.46%

+46.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.44%

-23.29%

+18.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.94%

-29.60%

+20.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.26%

-59.46%

+49.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-24.84%

+24.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-22.32%

+20.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

9.56%

-8.64%

Volatility

UDEC vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December (UDEC) is 1.81%, while CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that UDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDECFFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

7.60%

-5.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

28.17%

-23.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.61%

36.43%

-29.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.27%

29.75%

-22.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.98%

27.80%

-19.82%

UDEC vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDEC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDEC vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

UDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTY
CapForce IBD 50 ETF
1.26%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%
UDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDEC and FFTY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFTY has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to UDEC (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDEC dropped -13.37% vs FFTY's -59.46%.

On 5-year performance, UDEC leads with 7.38% vs -3.22% for FFTY. On fees, UDEC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, UDEC has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UDEC has performed better with a 7.38% return vs -3.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UDEC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for UDEC.

UDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FFTY is Mid Cap Growth Equities. UDEC tracks S&P 500, while FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and CapForce. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UDEC and 0.80% for FFTY.

UDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDEC and FFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer