PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDEC vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDEC vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December (UDEC) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDEC achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.


UDEC

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.11%
YTD
5.14%
6M
5.49%
1Y
17.31%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*

COMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.06%
1Y
47.51%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDEC vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December
5.14%12.97%9.52%16.80%-9.44%6.44%6.72%1.16%
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
39.67%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%-18.66%5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between UDEC and COMT is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.14

The correlation between UDEC and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UDEC vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDEC
COMT

Technology

36.2%

-

Financial Services

11.9%
100.0%

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

UDEC
36.2%
COMT

-

Financial Services

UDEC
11.9%
COMT
100.0%

Communication Services

UDEC
10.9%
COMT

-

Consumer Cyclical

UDEC
10.1%
COMT

-

Healthcare

UDEC
8.4%
COMT

-

Industrials

UDEC
8.1%
COMT

-

Consumer Defensive

UDEC
4.9%
COMT

-

Energy

UDEC
3.5%
COMT

-

Utilities

UDEC
2.3%
COMT

-

Real Estate

UDEC
1.9%
COMT

-

Basic Materials

UDEC
1.8%
COMT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDEC vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDEC
UDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
UDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
UDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDEC vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December (UDEC) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDECCOMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.66

2.24

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.89

2.88

+1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.40

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

5.95

-2.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.15

14.11

+5.04

UDEC vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDEC and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDECCOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.24

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.64

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.20

+0.71

Drawdowns

UDEC vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDEC drawdown since its inception was -13.37%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDEC and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDECCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-51.89%

+38.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.44%

-8.02%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.94%

-13.31%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.26%

-29.00%

+18.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-4.82%

+4.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-24.07%

+21.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

3.38%

-2.47%

Volatility

UDEC vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December (UDEC) is 0.93%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that UDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDECCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

7.37%

-6.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

18.80%

-14.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.53%

21.29%

-14.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.18%

21.06%

-13.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.02%

18.89%

-10.87%

UDEC vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDEC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDEC vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

UDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.54%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
UDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDEC and COMT have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to UDEC (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDEC dropped -13.37% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 13.50% vs 7.26% for UDEC. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, UDEC has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UDEC.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for UDEC.

UDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UDEC and 0.48% for COMT.

UDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDEC and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer