UD03.L vs. LCUK.L
UD03.L (UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and LCUK.L (Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - UD03.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while LCUK.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UD03.L returned 10.72%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for LCUK.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UD03.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUK.L.
Performance
UD03.L vs. LCUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UD03.L is traded in GBp, while LCUK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UD03.L achieves a 12.28% return, which is significantly higher than LCUK.L's 5.93% return.
UD03.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 12.28%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
LCUK.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 16.53%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- —
UD03.L vs. LCUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 12.28% | 25.20% | 0.78% | 19.24% | -4.62% | 10.81% | 5.72% | 0.00% |
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 5.93% | 21.01% | 9.05% | 7.25% | 2.15% | 18.06% | -11.83% | 0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between UD03.L and LCUK.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, UD03.L and LCUK.L have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.
UD03.L vs. LCUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UD03.L
LCUK.L
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
UD03.L
LCUK.L
Technology
UD03.L
LCUK.L
Consumer Defensive
UD03.L
LCUK.L
Industrials
UD03.L
LCUK.L
Utilities
UD03.L
LCUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
UD03.L
LCUK.L
Basic Materials
UD03.L
LCUK.L
Healthcare
UD03.L
LCUK.L
Communication Services
UD03.L
LCUK.L
Energy
UD03.L
LCUK.L
Real Estate
UD03.L
-
LCUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UD03.L vs. LCUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
UD03.L
LCUK.L
UD03.L vs. LCUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UD03.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.25 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 1.80 | +3.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.25 | 5.79 | +10.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UD03.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47 | 1.38 | +2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.75 | 0.77 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.51 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
UD03.L vs. LCUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UD03.L drawdown since its inception was -30.85%, smaller than the maximum LCUK.L drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD03.L and LCUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UD03.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.85% | -35.54% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.80% | -9.13% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.72% | -12.65% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.67% | -12.65% | -6.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -3.98% | +2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -4.97% | +1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 2.85% | +0.71% |
Volatility
UD03.L vs. LCUK.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) have volatilities of 3.58% and 3.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UD03.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 3.76% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 11.92% | +4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.46% | 12.97% | +14.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.29% | 15.69% | +31.60% |
UD03.L vs. LCUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UD03.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUK.L's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
UD03.L vs. LCUK.L - Dividend Comparison
UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while LCUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.68% | 3.05% | 3.94% | 3.86% | 3.00% | 3.48% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 2.54% | 2.97% | 2.84% | 3.67% | 3.96% | 3.50% | 2.07% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UD03.L and LCUK.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD03.L.
UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LCUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for UD03.L and 0.04% for LCUK.L.
Find the right allocation for UD03.L and LCUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer