UCIB vs. RLY
UCIB (ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B) and RLY (State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UCIB is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS Bloomberg CMCI Index, while RLY is a Global Allocation fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UCIB returned 10.54%/yr vs 8.16%/yr for RLY. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UCIB charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.
Performance
UCIB vs. RLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCIB achieves a 23.75% return, which is significantly higher than RLY's 15.29% return. Over the past 10 years, UCIB has outperformed RLY with an annualized return of 10.54%, while RLY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.16% annualized return.
UCIB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.70%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- YTD
- 23.75%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 11.45%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.77%
RLY
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- 27.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.13M | $7.99M | $7.88M | |
| $582.36K | $305.70K | $123.29K |
UCIB vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCIB ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B | 23.75% | 8.97% | 6.58% | -2.26% | 18.24% | 37.34% | 1.10% | 10.86% | -9.48% | 5.85% |
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 15.29% | 20.26% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 7.86% | 22.85% | -0.59% | 15.63% | -11.72% | 10.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCIB and RLY is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2015 | 0.46 |
The correlation between UCIB and RLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCIB vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank
UCIB
RLY
UCIB vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB) and State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCIB | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.47 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 3.61 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 12.56 | -8.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCIB vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCIB drawdown since its inception was -51.29%, which is greater than RLY's maximum drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCIB and RLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCIB | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.29% | -37.75% | -13.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.67% | -7.54% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.67% | -10.08% | -12.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.67% | -18.94% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.94% | -34.17% | -2.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.37% | -3.15% | -10.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.97% | -9.40% | -11.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.77% | 2.16% | +5.61% |
Volatility
UCIB vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB) has a higher volatility of 22.90% compared to State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) at 2.61%. This indicates that UCIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCIB | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.90% | 2.61% | +20.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.85% | 8.06% | +28.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.64% | 10.61% | +29.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 13.46% | +15.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 13.80% | +10.65% |
UCIB vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCIB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UCIB vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison
UCIB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 3.07% | 3.24% | 3.31% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% |
UCIB ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCIB and RLY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCIB has higher volatility (22.90%) compared to RLY (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCIB dropped -51.29% vs RLY's -37.75%.
On 10-year performance, UCIB leads with 10.54% vs 8.16% for RLY. On fees, RLY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UCIB has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RLY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for UCIB.
RLY has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.00% for UCIB.
UCIB is categorized as Commodities, while RLY is Global Allocation. UCIB tracks UBS Bloomberg CMCI Index, while RLY tracks Bloomberg U.S. Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for UCIB and 0.50% for RLY.
RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCIB and RLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer