UCIB vs. BCD
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD).
UCIB and BCD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UCIB is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the UBS Bloomberg CMCI Index. It was launched on Oct 8, 2015. BCD is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017.
Performance
UCIB vs. BCD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UCIB vs. BCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCIB ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B | 17.46% | 8.97% | 6.58% | -2.26% | 18.24% | 37.34% | 1.10% | 10.86% | -9.48% | 8.55% |
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 15.57% | 15.71% | 6.20% | -7.58% | 18.38% | 31.87% | 4.76% | 7.34% | -8.65% | 3.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCIB achieves a 17.46% return, which is significantly higher than BCD's 15.57% return.
UCIB
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 8.87%
- YTD
- 17.46%
- 6M
- 21.31%
- 1Y
- 24.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
BCD
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 15.57%
- 6M
- 21.94%
- 1Y
- 22.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UCIB vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCIB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UCIB vs. BCD — Risk / Return Rank
UCIB
BCD
UCIB vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCIB | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 1.51 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 2.02 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 2.42 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 7.58 | -1.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCIB | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.51 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.90 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.65 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between UCIB and BCD is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
UCIB vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison
UCIB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.89%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCIB ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.89% | 17.21% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
UCIB vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCIB drawdown since its inception was -36.94%, which is greater than BCD's maximum drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCIB and BCD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCIB | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.94% | -29.81% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -9.75% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.95% | -23.03% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -2.53% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.12% | -10.01% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 3.11% | +0.80% |
Volatility
UCIB vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB) is 5.12%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that UCIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UCIB | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 5.53% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 11.60% | +4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.34% | 15.15% | +7.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 15.42% | +8.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 13.93% | +7.69% |