PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCEQX vs. CAEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UCEQX vs. CAEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCEQX achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly lower than CAEIX's 22.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UCEQX having a 11.59% annualized return and CAEIX not far ahead at 11.76%.


UCEQX

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.24%
YTD
13.72%
6M
14.35%
1Y
30.58%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
11.59%

CAEIX

1D
-0.64%
1M
2.03%
YTD
22.32%
6M
22.00%
1Y
47.35%
3Y*
13.66%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
11.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCEQX vs. CAEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
13.72%23.71%14.50%19.36%-16.25%19.68%10.76%22.49%-12.06%22.59%
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
22.32%32.61%-7.13%5.67%-17.43%6.73%61.52%33.48%-19.26%29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between UCEQX and CAEIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2012

0.87

The correlation between UCEQX and CAEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UCEQX vs. CAEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCEQX
UCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
UCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

CAEIX
CAEIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CAEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CAEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCEQX vs. CAEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCEQXCAEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.50

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

5.76

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.48

19.89

-4.41

UCEQX vs. CAEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCEQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the CAEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCEQX and CAEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UCEQXCAEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.94

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.32

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.60

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.07

+0.63

Drawdowns

UCEQX vs. CAEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCEQX drawdown since its inception was -35.33%, smaller than the maximum CAEIX drawdown of -75.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCEQX and CAEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UCEQXCAEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.33%

-75.81%

+40.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-8.39%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.64%

-24.57%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

-32.58%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.33%

-37.54%

+2.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.64%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-48.63%

+43.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.43%

-0.44%

Volatility

UCEQX vs. CAEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) is 3.72%, while Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that UCEQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UCEQXCAEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

5.77%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

12.87%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

16.45%

-4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

19.18%

-3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

19.69%

-3.19%

UCEQX vs. CAEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCEQX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CAEIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

UCEQX vs. CAEIX - Dividend Comparison

UCEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than CAEIX's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
0.59%0.72%1.17%1.07%0.86%0.49%0.82%1.23%2.00%1.40%1.79%0.72%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
4.46%5.08%2.56%5.10%6.80%4.61%8.25%4.79%6.73%1.91%3.16%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


UCEQX and CAEIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAEIX has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to UCEQX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCEQX dropped -35.33% vs CAEIX's -75.81%.

CAEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCEQX and CAEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer